Wednesday, December 14, 2011

DECEMBER 2011













PEACE ON EARTH, GOOD WILL TO ALL!


Dear Reader,

Although it’s a holiday season for many of us, I always hesitate to wish readers a Merry or Happy Holiday because I don’t know how merry or happy you can be, either in prison, or at home missing your incarcerated loved one. So instead I send wishes that you will experience something wonderful whenever and wherever you are. Sometimes joy comes in a very small package at a very unexpected moment, so I hope you will keep your heart open and ready. Joy to the world!

Please be well, keep the faith, share the news, and for everyone’s sake, get involved!
The Editor



Article Summaries:


1. Attica - The Correctional Association (CA) of New York visited Attica C. F. on April 12 and 13, 2011 and reports that Attica has changed significantly since 1971, although some severe problems do persist. So severe that Director Soffiyah Elijah concludes that it is broken beyond repair, and Governor Cuomo should shutter its doors forever.

2. Dorothy Day Apartment building on Riverside Dr. in West Harlem once was home to drug dealers but is now not only beautiful, but it also pulses with pride and hope and happiness. 


3. The Guardian Newspaper is interested in hearing from U.S. inmates, their families, prison guards or anyone whose life has been impacted by incarceration.


4. Hour Children, a Queens nonprofit group, is creating affordable housing in Long Island City for formerly incarcerated women trying to rebuild their lives. 


5. Job Op: Trinity Alliance of the Capital Region is seeking a program director for their SNUG program.


6. Legislation: 65%, Merit Time Bill, SAFE Parole Act, Domestic Violence Survivor Justice Act

7. NYS Parole Reform Campaign will present a workshop at the Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic & Asian Legislative Caucus Weekend in February. We continue to work on clarifying the changes to the current parole statute. Part 3 of Setting the Record Straight deals with Parole’s 3 R’s.


8. Column #2 of the New York State Prisoner Justice Network discusses their involvement with Occupy Wall Street and asks for your involvement in that work.

9. Parole News: TAP and COMPAS per Chairwoman Evans; October parole release decisions. 


10. Prisoner of the Census: An Albany judge has upheld a state law that counts inmates, for legislative reapportionment purposes, in their home community rather than the district in which they are incarcerated. 


11. Prison Legal Services is looking for lawyers to do pro-bono work and offers incentives.

12. Radio messages from home to those inside. CALLS FROM HOME is a gripping radio broadcast that brings the voices of prisoner families, former prisoners, poets, musicians, and everyday citizens to the airwaves. The broadcast consists of holiday greetings from family members to their loved ones behind bars and the over 2.4 million people incarcerated in the United States.

13. Taking Care of Business means communities building an inclusive environment for people returning home from prison, by Karima Amin, CEO of Prisoners Are People Too, Inc. 


14. Opportunities for getting involved in the struggle for justice: Actions, Events and Meetings.
 
[For copies of articles referred to in this issue, please send an email to PAN with a request stating # and title of article and date.]



1. ATTICA: CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION CONDUCTED AN INSPECTION OF THE PRISON AND POSTED THEIR FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND CONCLUSION ON THEIR WEBSITE.

INSPECTION
The Correctional Association (CA) of New York visited Attica Correctional Facility on April 12 and 13, 2011. They obtained surveys about general prison conditions from 269 inmates in general confinement, in addition to 63 program- or location-specific surveys from inmates in special programs and housing units.


Attica Correctional Facility: 2011 – The September 1971 Attica rebellion brought the plight of incarcerated individuals to the forefront of the nation’s consciousness. No longer would these invisible people experience invisible injustice behind brick walls and barbed wire fences. The prisoners’ demands included basic civil rights such as medical care, religious and political freedom, in addition to a living wage and opportunities for education and rehabilitation.

Prison conditions throughout New York State have come a long way in the past 40 years– inmates are afforded better medical care, opportunities for religious expression, and mandatory educational programming for those without a high school diploma or equivalent; however, we have a significant way to go – many prisons are still not safe, adequacy of medical care varies from facility to facility and most inmates are paid equal to or less per hour than in 1971. Attica has changed significantly since 1971, although some severe problems do persist.

The Correctional Association of NY is an independent, non-profit organization with unique legislative authority to inspect prisons and report its findings and recommendations to the legislature, the public and the press. Through monitoring, research, public education and policy recommendations, the CA strives to make the administration of justice in New York State more fair, efficient and humane.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
: Click here to read the Correctional Association’s findings and their followup recommendations.

CONCLUSION
In her article, “Beyond Repair”, Soffiyah Elijah, Executive Director of C. A., concludes with the following:
Unable to cast off its violent past, Attica Correctional Facility stands as a bold testament to inhumanity. It is broken beyond repair, and Governor Cuomo should shutter its doors forever. Symbolically, the closure of the facility would serve as an acknowledgment of the violence and brutality inflicted upon the prisoners of Attica at the hands of the state. Fiscally, prison closures continue to make sense for our cash-strapped state. Recognizing the inefficiency of New York’s over-reliance on incarceration, Governor Cuomo has already designated several facilities for closure. These downsizing efforts should continue, and Attica should be next on the Governor’s list.
[To read the article click here. ]



2. DOROTHY DAY APARTMENTS IN WEST HARLEM

In his September 23, 2011 NY Times Op-Ed, “It Takes a Village”, Charles Blow describes the Dorothy Day Apartments on Riverside Drive in West Harlem. [The following is a condensation. For the complete article click here]

The building is the sixth in the neighborhood run by Broadway Housing Communities, and the first to include a day care center serving both the building and the community. This former drug den is not only beautiful, but it also pulses with pride and hope and happiness. It’s just what I needed to see. Writing about children and the poor and the vulnerable these days, there aren’t very many bright spots — but this is one.

The children are bathed by natural light that floods into the basement through skylights. The floors are covered by beautiful green ceramic tile made to look like slate. The walls are painted a sunrise yellow, lined with thick wooden moldings and covered with well-framed pieces of art — some by the children, some donated. The courtyard, which had been filled with six feet of garbage, is covered with mats and used as an area where wee little legs that barely have kneecaps can be folded into funky shapes for daily yoga. Above the day care center are six floors of housing for 190 people, more than half of whom are children and all of whom were either homeless or in extreme poverty. Many of the adults are the hardest cases: those recovering from drug addiction, those with chronic diseases like H.I.V. and those with mental disabilities. In fact, most of the adults suffer from some form of disability. And on the top floor is an art gallery that opens onto a sweeping veranda, lined with flowering plants and with some of the most magnificent Hudson River views in the city.

There are no security guards. There is no commotion. There are no signs of institutional living like names above doors. There isn’t even so much as a crayon mark on any of the walls. This is an oasis of civility and tranquility and culture inhabited — and to some degree, self-policed — by people whom the world would rob of those dignities.

So why so much emphasis on beauty and art, I asked? One administrator responded resolutely: “You don’t just give a person four walls to live in. You give them something to be inspired by.” Another administrator said that the environment helped to “stabilize the parents to provide a platform for the children.” And those children, she said, can create “pathways out of poverty” for the whole family.

The Dorothy Day Apartments have been open since 2003, and they have had no arrests and no teenage pregnancies, unless you count the girl who was pregnant when she moved in. Most of the children went through the Head Start program in the basement, which now mostly serves the surrounding community. None of the children have dropped out of school. A handful have even earned scholarships to the city’s better private schools. Of the 10 children who have graduated from high school, eight have gone on to college and one has just graduated from college. (None of the adults in the building have ever been to college.)

The building runs mentoring programs and literacy programs and English as a second language programs. It maintains a computer lab and this week launched a partnership with what is essentially an international, Internet-based book club for boys in the building. (The girls’ group will begin next week.) It’s fantastic.

The cost of the building plus renovations was $17 million. So if it houses 190 people, that works out to about $89,500 a person, not including most of the children served by the day care center. According to the New York State Commission of Correction, 1,000 new jail beds will have been built between the end of 2007 and the end of 2011 in the counties of Albany, Essex, Rensselaer and Suffolk at a cost of $100,000 per bed. Furthermore, as Broadway Housing Communities points out on its Web site, “permanent supportive housing for an individual costs taxpayers $12,500 annually, compared to annual costs of $25,000 for an emergency shelter cot; $60,000 for a prison cell; and $125,000 for a psychiatric hospital bed.”



3. THE GUARDIAN NEWS (www.guardiannews.com) IS STARTING A NEW SERIES ON AMERICAN PRISONS AND THE IMPACT OF INCARCERATION ON INDIVIDUALS AND COMMUNITIES. THEY INVITE YOUR STORY:

We are interested in hearing from inmates, their families, prison guards or anyone whose life has been impacted negatively or otherwise by the system of incarceration. If you would like to contribute to the series, please write to: Sadhbh Walshe, The Guardian, PO Box 1466, New York, NY 10150. Or send an email.



4. HOUSING FOR FORMERLY INCARCERATED WOMEN BEING BUILT IN QUEENS BY HOUR CHILDREN

According to the NY Daily News, Tuesday, November 08, 2011 in an article by Sam Levin, the nonprofit group, Hour Children, is creating affordable housing in Long Island City for formerly incarcerated women trying to rebuild their lives.

For women leaving prison, one of the greatest challenges is finding a stable place to live. The organization is breaking ground next week on an 18-unit apartment building, on the heels of opening 14 units in Corona in September.


“These women need a place they can call home that is safe and supportive,” said Sister Tesa Fitzgerald, executive director and founder. “You have to build all those building blocks before you can launch a new life.”



5. JOB OPPORTUNITY: TRINITY ALLIANCE OF THE CAPITAL REGION WILL BE RESTARTING SNUG IN THE NEW YEAR. IN ANTICIPATION, THEY ARE SEEKING A PROGRAM DIRECTOR
.
Qualified candidates are those who:

have street and criminal justice experiences similar to the individuals SNUG targets

possess strong administrative, communication, management and computer skills

are able to lead and supervise a diverse workforce, and work within a team and an established agency setting

are able to work flexible, non-traditional hours

are willing to regularly undergo random substance abuse screenings

are able to demonstrate credibility and investment in working with a wide range of parties including but not limited to neighbors, family members and friends of victims and shooters, hospital emergency room personnel, the faith community and school and community public safety officials.

Cover letters and resumes may be emailed to: h.oberlander@ta-cr.org



6. LEGISLATION
Currently, Correction Law §803 grants 1/3 off indeterminate sentences and 1/7 off determinate sentences for good behavior. 2/3 is 66% so maybe this is what the readers who ask about “the 65% reduction” mean, only 66% is what’s served, not what’s taken off. Under §803, not every crime is eligible, especially not violent offenses. The Merit Time Bill S 338 didn’t change the amount of the time cut but it did include more categories of offenses (specifically violent crimes). It did not pass. It was vetoed in the Senate Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections committee.

A7939/S5374, The SAFE Parole Act, which I hope by now everyone understands remains sitting in committee, and has not become law. Until it passes, a person can still be denied parole based on the nature of their offense. See more about that in Articles 6 and 7, and at www.parolereform.org.

Another bill we support is the Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act, Bill A.7874/S.5436, which would allow alternative sentencing for some crimes committed as a result of domestic violence, and the possibility of re-sentencing for those already in prison. The Women In Prison Project provides a website just for that bill: www.dvsurvivorsjusticeact.org.



7. NYS PAROLE REFORM CAMPAIGN

NYS PRC will be hosting a workshop at the Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic & Asian Legislative Caucus Weekend.  Senator Perkins was instrumental in getting us on the agenda. Although the time has not been set, the date will probably be Saturday Feb 18, 2012. Our workshop is titled: CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERIES, Parole Release Decisions in the Era of Reintegration. It will “provide perspectives and concrete strategies for creating a parole model that advances public safety and promotes successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society, particularly those communities of color who are severely impacted by mass incarceration.” We will have a panel of 5-6 participants and a moderator.  The panel will answer questions posed by the moderator and from the audience. Stay tuned for more.

DECEMBER 19, JUDITH BRINK WILL BE PRESENTING THE SAFE PAROLE ACT TO PRISON FAMILIES OF NY IN ALBANY. See details in Article 14, under Albany Meetings.

ANOTHER ORGANIZATION SIGNS IN SUPPORT: The Staten Island Executive Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends brings to 63 the number of organizations who support the SAFE Parole Act. We feel very humbled by such an outpouring of support for something that was just a dream in the hearts of the families who attended Family Empowerment Day 4 in 2009. We’ve come a long way, and there’s much farther to go, but we will not give up until our men and women in prison are judged by who they have become and not for what they did in the past.

CORRECTING SOME MISUNDERSTANDINGS ABOUT THE 2011 CHANGES TO PAROLE BOARD POLICIES:
In 2011, the governor revised parole board policies when he merged DOCS and the Division of Parole. He left the Board as an independent body. In doing so he revised the parole statute to direct the Parole Board to:

1. consider the person’s readiness for reentry and reintegration.
2. establish procedures for including risk and needs principles in their decision making process.

The other 8 factors that the parole board must consider are the same as always, except they are now all in one place. They still include “the seriousness of the offense”.

In 2011 the Safe And Fair Evaluations (SAFE) Parole Act was introduced to the legislature as Senate Bill 5374 and Assembly Bill 7939. It is not a law. To become a law it will have to pass in both houses of the legislature and be signed by the governor.

[That’s a lot of people to convince to support something. It should be easy though, since it makes a whole lot of moral and financial sense. So don’t give up! Every person who joins this effort increases our chance of success. Talk to your legislators. Tell them you want this bill passed, and why. Call us if you need more information: 518 253 7533.]

Until the SAFE Parole Act passes there is nothing preventing the Parole Board from denying parole based on the nature of the crime.

SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT, PART 3 IN THE SERIES: RELEASE, REENTRY, REINTEGRATION: HOW THE SAFE PAROLE ACT IS NECESSARY FOR ALL THREE.

The Importance of the Safe and Fair Evaluations (S.A.F.E.) Parole Act in Making Decisions about Release, Reentry, and Reintegration

Penal Law 1.05 states that in addition to punishment (retribution), deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation there is a fifth goal: “the promotion of their [incarcerated people’s] successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society.” [emphasis added]

The purpose of this article is to define reintegration, and to show how necessary the SAFE Parole Act is in achieving it.

Reentry and reintegration are commonly thought of as meaning the same thing, but they are, in actuality, very different:

Reentry is the process of returning to one’s community and finding a way to get basic needs met - such as housing, food, employment - without resorting to criminal activities. Preparation for reentry starts in prison, with programs that prepare the person for life on the outside. In recent years outside agencies have gotten funding to meet reentry needs and continue to help a person remain at liberty without reverting to a life of crime. Parole needs to to create linkages for their clients with community agencies that can meet their subsistence needs, such as food, clothing, employment, medical care, and public assistance. Most community organizations offer case management to get a person back on their feet. Most don’t go any further.

Reintegration is established when the formerly incarcerated person has developed social ties that help him or her continue to live at liberty without breaking the law. This person needs to be connected with a new environment which encourages and rewards legitimate behaviors and attitudes. The shorter the period of incarceration, the easier this task will be.

Part of this new involvement is with groups such as neighborhood associations, faith groups, men’s groups, women’s groups; groups where he or she is accepted as a contributing member to the positive goals of the group. Reintegration is the last stage in our criminal justice system, and therefore it must be the goal of all the stages that precede it, from arrest forward. It’s the capacity to live at liberty without disobeying the law. The community must get involved in nurturing legitimate lifestyles in the lives of the men and women returning from prison.


In NYS’s criminal justice system the judicial system sets the punishment, which may include a period of incarceration. Prisons are responsible for providing deterrence and the tools for rehabilitation. The Parole Board’s job is to assess a person’s readiness to leave the incarceration stage behind and begin the process of reintegration.

This is where the SAFE Parole Act becomes necessary. Even with the recent revisions to the law, which mandate the use of a Transitional Accountability Plan and a Risk and Needs Assessment, the criminal justice system has not moved significantly closer to the fifth goal of reintegration. As long as the Parole Board can continue to base release decisions on the crime, which a person can never change, people who are truly ready to begin the process of reintegration will continue to be denied. The Safe and Fair Evaluations (S.A.F.E.) Parole Act doesn’t leave it up to the Parole Board to voluntarily create procedures that would lead to fairer parole hearings, it includes them right in the bill.


Unlike the recently implemented changes, the SAFE Parole Act is based on an understanding that what a person does, what his or her attitudes and behaviors have become over the course of many years, are the most important indicators of readiness for reintegration, and thus for release from prison.

Most importantly, if the parole applicant’s attitude and/or behavior does not meet their standards, the Parole Board must spell out what he or she must do in order to be considered ready for release to parole supervision. Once those requirements have been met, the person must be released.

No one can ever know for sure that another person will commit a crime. But there are good indicators in the SAFE PAROLE ACT, and the Parole Board can do no better than to base their decision on them.

TAP and R&NA will continue to be used by Parole’s Community Supervision once the person is back in society, and will extend until the person has reached the final goal of reintegration.

by Larry White



8. THE NEW YORK PRISONER JUSTICE NETWORK COLUMN

Dear Building Bridges Reader,

The New York State Prisoner Justice Network is honored to continue with our regular column for Building Bridges. This is column #2. Last month, we gave an overview of The NYS Prisoner Justice Network. This month we will discuss our involvement with Occupy Wall Street and ask for your involvement in that work. 

Occupy Wall Street is an international protest movement inspired by recent uprisings in Egypt, Tunisia, Greece, and Spain. In September, several hundred people gathered in Zuccotti Park in downtown Manhattan. What started as a relatively small number of activists quickly expanded into a global movement with over 950 occupations in over 85 countries. 

The Occupy Movement protests the huge gap in wealth between the 1% who control the world’s resources and the 99% who don’t. The Occupy Movement was started by mostly white middle-class students and quickly gained support from community organizations, labor unions, and Occupy The Hood, a project that links the Occupy Movement with existing organizing projects led mostly by poor people and people of color. 

The Occupy Movement has also sparked important debates about issues of liberation and justice: militarism, migration, racism and colonialism, sexism and gender, and how these issues intersect with the economic system. Many long term community activists are pushing the Occupy Movement to understand how poor people and people of color have been effectively organizing around these issues for generations and are the natural leaders of any movement for social change. 

The Occupy Movement has provided an important opportunity for the prison justice community in New York. Members of the New York State Prisoner Justice Network are holding weekly teach-ins on the prison industrial complex, the system that cages nearly 2.4 million people in the United States.


We are trying to help people understand how prisons and policing are connected to every other issue about social transformation, including jobs, schools, healthcare, housing and racial justice. We are also in the process of becoming a Formerly Incarcerated People’s Caucus at Occupy Wall Street, which would help bring the voices of those most impacted by prison into the regular debates of the Occupy Movement. 

Though our group includes formerly incarcerated people, family members of those currently incarcerated, and activists who work on prison and policing issues on the outside, we believe that the experience and expertise of people who currently survive behind prison walls must be heard and understood in order to transform this system and our broader society.
We would be grateful for your involvement in our work at Occupy Wall Street. You can participate by answering the following questions: 

What is the prison industrial complex? (In your own view - how you understand the system, how it impacts you and others). 

What should justice look like instead of prisons? 

We will include your responses in the content and analysis of future teach-ins. Please send responses to NYSPJN, 33 Central Avenue, Albany NY 12210 or nysprisonerjustice@gmail.com



9. PAROLE NEWS

TRANSITIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY PLANS (TAP) and RISK AND NEEDS ASSESSMENTS (COMPAS)

From the testimony of Andrea Evans, Chairwoman of the Board of Parole, before the Assembly Committee on Correction, Nov 10, 2011, we gained some further insight into how TAP and Risk and Needs Assessments will be used in parole decisions. The following information is from her written testimony to the Committee.

The Board has been working closely with the DOCCS in developing the TAP instrument. It will be the instrument that measures the rehabilitation of persons appearing before the Board, as well as their likelihood of success in the community when released. Each member of the Board has received training in the use of both the TAP instrument and a risk and needs instrument known as the COMPAS instrument. Currently the use of these instruments is being piloted in 3 correctional facilities for the purpose of establishing appropriate conditions of supervision. When the pilot phase is concluded, the Board will use them to assess the appropriateness of an inmate’s release to community supervision. Because the TAP instrument reflects an inmate’s overall effort toward his or her rehabilitation while incarcerated and draws upon information closely associated with their risk of re-offending, and their needs in order to become successful, the Board’s written procedures will call for the use and careful consideration of these documents.

As an interim measure, I have instructed the Board to use the TAP instrument where and when it has been prepared for a parole eligible inmate. I have emphasized that when the Board considers an inmate for parole, they must ascertain what steps he or he has taken toward their rehabilitation and the likelihood of their success once released to community supervision.

The one function that has been transferred from the Board to DOCCS is the granting of certificates of relief and certificates of good conduct. Last year the Board granted 1,695 such certificates. DOCCS has granted 1,581 since April 2011.



OCTOBER 2011 PAROLE BOARD RELEASES - A1 VIOLENT FELONIES - DIN’s through 1999
unofficial research from parole database


TOTALS
Total Interviews............... # Released....... # Denied.. Rate of release
18 Initials....................... 3...................... 15............ 17%
69 Reappearances........... 19.................... 50............ 28%
87 Total.......................... 22.................... 65............ 25%

OCTOBER INITIAL RELEASES
FACILITY.......... SENTENCE.....OFFENSE..... # of BOARD
Bare Hill........... 22-Life............ Murder 2......... 1st *
Fishkill............. 19-Life............ Murder 2......... 1st
Fishkill............. 20-Life............ Murder 2......... 1st
* for deportation

OCTOBER REAPPEARANCE RELEASES
FACILITY..........SENTENCE......OFFENSE..... # OF BOARD
Altona.............. 25-Life......Murder pre-74....... 8th
Attica...............4.5-Life......Murder 2............... 5th
Auburn............ 25-Life.......Murder 2................2nd
Auburn............ 25-Life.......Murder 2............... 2nd
Clinton............ 15-Life.......Murder 2............... 12th
Collins............. 15-Life.......Murder 2............... 11th
Franklin........... 16-Life.......Murder 2............... 3rd
Green Haven.... 28-Life.......Murder 2............... 2nd
Groveland ........20-Life.......Murder 2............... 5th
Mt. McGregor... 23-Life.......Murder 2............... 5th
Orleans............ 20-Life.......Murder 2................6th
Otisville........... 15-Life.......Murder 2............... 3rd
Otisville........... 15-Life.......Murder 2............... 4th
Otisville........... 25-Life.......Murder 2................2nd
Sullivan............ 15-Life.......Murder 2............... 3rd
Taconic............ 15-Life.......Murder 2............... 2nd
Upstate............15-Life......Murder 2............... 6th
Washington......15-Life......Murder 2............... 3rd
Woodbourne.... 20-Life......Murder 2 ................2nd




10. PRISONERS OF THE CENSUS

ALBANY JUDGE UPHOLDS LAW ON COUNTING PRISONERS

Early this month Supreme Court Justice Eugene P. Devine ruled to uphold the state law known as Part XX which requires that incarcerated people be counted in their home communities. not in the districts where they are imprisoned. An appeal may be made, but for 2012 redistricting purposes the law will be followed This will give all registered voters in NYS an equally weighted vote. The next step, hopefully, will be to give incarcerated citizens the right to vote.

Justice Devine said that even if the law "is the product of a power play by Democratic lawmakers to usurp the strength of the Republican Party," the law survives constitutional scrutiny. "Though inmates may be physically found in the locations of their respective correctional facilities at the time the census is conducted, there is nothing in the record to indicate that such inmates have any actual permanency in these locations or have intent to remain," he said.

 Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman, whose office defended the law that he championed as a state senator, called the ruling a "victory for fundamental fairness and equal representation." Read all about it




11. PRISONERS' LEGAL SERVICES IS LOOKING FOR LAWYERS WILLING TO DONATE THEIR TIME TO REPRESENT PRISONERS ALLEGING A VIOLATION OF THEIR RIGHTS

BENEFITS;
Education about a new area of law, litigation experience and CLE credits.

Support from PLS, including use of office space and access to office supplies and equipment.

Through partnerships with several NY law schools, volunteer attorneys will have the option of utilizing law students for case-related research and writing tasks.

PLS provides professional liability insurance for all volunteer/pro bono attorneys.

Interested lawyers may contact Samantha Howell at showell@plsny.org or PLS, 41 State St., Suite M112, Albany NY 12207




12. CALLS FROM HOME is a gripping radio broadcast that brings the voices of prisoner families, former prisoners, poets, musicians, and everyday citizens to the airwaves. The broadcast consists of holiday greetings from family members to their loved ones behind bars and the over 2.4 million people incarcerated in the United States.

The show is now available for you to listen and to share with your friends.

Spread the joy this holiday season and bring powerful, moving voices to the airwaves

Get involved with a national campaign to address the cost of prison phone calls and find out about special tools you cn use with Calls from Home.

Working together we created an amazing radio program. Thanks for your support.




13. TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS IS TAKING CARE OF EACH ANOTHER
 
It is a fact that each of us is multi-dimensional. I am a mother, teacher, woman, friend, taxpayer, golden ager, and storyteller and the list goes on. Why do we have so much trouble realizing that this is true of everyone, including our incarcerated population and our formerly incarcerated neighbors? These groups are also multi-dimensional and yet we have a tendency to paint them all with the same brush and to label them in ways that fail to acknowledge their growth and development as fully human. We see them as “criminals” and “ex-cons” and nothing more. We don’t view them as parents, senior citizens, veterans, or simply as sisters and brothers and children who got caught in their wrongdoing. Some of them are living with long-standing and long-ignored mental health issues or issues of substance abuse. It seems easier to look the other way and to ignore the poverty and racism and other crime generative factors that may have led to incarceration. One important part of “taking care of business” is taking care of each other. Sadly, too many of us have failed to honor this charge.
 
When formerly incarcerated people come home, they are frequently faced with people in the community who shun them, broken promises of reentry help that never materialize, and false steps to reintegration that may thwart their desire to become community assets. In this community, there are a few people whose criminal histories are public knowledge. They are mentors, ministers, paralegals, authors, activists, business owners and more. They are hard workers who are laying some of the bricks that we need to create strong, vibrant, and progressive neighborhoods. They are our sisters and brothers. Working with them in the business of building community is everyone’s responsibility.

By Karima Amin, Dir. Prisoners Are People Too, Inc.




14. OPPORTUNITIES FOR GETTING INVOLVED IN THE STRUGGLE FOR JUSTICE; ACTIONS, EVENTS, MEETINGS.

ACTIONS: Many communities in our state have OCCUPY movements; they need people there talking about criminal justice issues. Everyone has a voice at their General Assemblies and in fact women and minorities are often given preference in speaking order. There are 12 Occupy cities in NYS identified on Wikipedia: Albany, Binghamton, Buffalo, Fredonia, Ithaca, Kingston, New Paltz, Poughkeepsie, Rochester, Saranac Lake, Syracuse, and Utica.

_________________________________________________________________

EVENTS
HARLEM
December 21, 6-9PM Occupy Harlem General Assembly (speaking of Occupies...)
Guest Speaker Glen Ford, Executive Editor, Black Agenda Report
More info: occupyharlemgeneralassembly@gmail.com

Location: St. Philip’s Church, 204 W. 134th St, off Adam Clayton Powell Blvd.
#2 or 3 train, 135th St stop.
___________________________________________________________________________________

MEETINGS
ALBANY
MONDAY DECEMBER 19, 7:00 - 8:30PM PRISON FAMILIES OF NEW YORK

Speaker Meeting
Guest Speaker:  Judith Brink, Prison Action Network, speaking on Parole Reform

Free and open to the public. Holiday refreshments

All other Mondays of the month meetings are in the form of support groups. If you have an incarcerated loved one you are welcome. Same place, same time.

Location: 373 Central Av, Albany near McDonalds
_____________________________________________________

BUFFALO meeting
MONDAY JANUARY 30, 2012 PRISONERS ARE PEOPLE TOO!
We’ve never held a monthly meeting in December and this December is no different. Our volunteers need a break to rejuvenate, meditate, and celebrate. Monthly meetings will resume next year. Until then, we wish you "BEST BLESSINGS FOR THIS HOLIDAY SEASON AND BEYOND!"
 
"God has not called us to see through each other, but to see each other through." (Anonymous)
____________________________________________________

HARLEM meeting
OCCASIONAL SATURDAYS 1-4 PM FAMILIES BEHIND THE WALL MEETINGS

Sponsored by Senator Bill Perkins, held in his office. Open to all who have a family member or friend in prison and would like to see some changes. Please contact special assistant Tahj Berrien for date of next meeting or for more information at 212-222-7315; tahj.berrien@gmail.com

Location: Adam Clayton Powell Jr. State Office Bldg., 163 W. 125th St., Suite 912, NYC 10027



Building Bridges is published by Prison Action Network as a way of communicating with our members.
If you would like to join, please call us at 518 253 7533 or send an email.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

NOVEMBER 2011













DURING THE MONTH WE POST LATE BREAKING ANNOUNCEMENTS OR NEWS HERE. TO GO IMMEDIATELY TO THE NOV 15TH ISSUE OF BUILDING BRIDGES PLEASE SCROLL DOWN.



POSTED DEC 7, NYCLU

PROLONGED ISOLATED CONFINEMENT:

The NYCLU is convening a meeting on December 14th from 10:00 AM – 11:30 AM to discuss prolonged isolated confinement in New York. We welcome everyone working on these issues in New York to attend. If you would like to attend, please email me and we can send you additional information on attending in person or by phone as well as an agenda.

Thank you.

Scarlet Kim | Legal Fellow
New York Civil Liberties Union
125 Broad Street | 19th Floor | New York, NY | 10004
212-607-3343 | skim@nyclu.org




POSTED DEC 5 - Thousand Kites (www.callsfromhome.org)

CALLS FROM HOME
Thousand Kites needs your help to produce “Calls from Home,” a special radio project that connects prisoners to their families.  With your support we are going to send voices through prison walls and over barbed-wire to the millions of our neighbors behind bars this holiday season.  

Sing a song, read a prayer, speak from the heart and let those inside know you are thinking about them. Call in a holiday wish now at 877-410-4863 to our toll-free 24/7 answering machine.



POSTED DEC 2 - www.Prisonersofthecensus.org

NEW LAW ENDING PRSION-BASED GERRYMANDERING UPHELD IN NY SUPREME COURT

Albany, NY – New York Supreme Court Justice Eugene Devine today [12/2/11] upheld New York’s law ending prison-based gerrymandering in the Little v. LATFOR lawsuit. His decision squarely rejects the plaintiffs’ claim that the New York law violated various provisions of the New York State Constitution.

Attorneys for the fifteen voters from around New York State who joined the suit as intervenor-defendants issued the following joint statement:

By eliminating the political distortion caused by prison-based gerrymandering, the new law upheld by today’s decision will ensure fairer representation for all New Yorkers, starting with this year’s redistricting.

Judge Devine’s decision affirms what we have known from the beginning: the law ending prison-based gerrymandering advances fairness in redistricting and is in complete agreement with New York’s state constitution. Now that Justice Devine has made his decision, we look forward to seeing LATFOR implement the new law in the coming months.

The organizations representing the fifteen voters in court were the Brennan Center for Justice, the Center for Law & Social Justice, DÄ“mos, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund , the New York Civil Liberties Union, and the Prison Policy Initiative. In today's ruling rejecting Plaintiffs' legal challenge, the Court repeatedly cited the organizations' arguments explaining the policies and legal precedent supporting New York’s law.

On Aug. 4, Judge Devine granted the fifteen voters permission to intervene and defend the law. The defendants in the lawsuit were government bodies charged with carrying out the new law: the New York State Legislative Task Force on Demographic Research and Reapportionment (LATFOR), and the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS). The New York State Attorney General’s office is representing DOCCS.

The new law, known as “Part XX,” requires that incarcerated persons be allocated to their home communities for state and local redistricting and reapportionment but does not affect funding distributions. This tracks with the New York State Constitution’s explicit provision that incarceration does not change one’s residence.

New York State Senator Elizabeth Little and a group of co-plaintiffs sought to restore New York’s former practice, which artificially inflated the voting strength of select communities at the expense of all others by allocating incarcerated persons to the districts where prisons are located, rather than to their home addresses.

A recent Quinnipiac University poll reported that public opinion is against prison-based gerrymandering, with a majority of New York State voters agreeing that “prison inmates should be counted as residents of their home districts, not of where they’re imprisoned.” The poll found that majorities of voters from both parties, and majorities of both upstate and downstate voters, favored “counting inmates in their homes, not their prisons.”




BRIDGES, NOVEMBER 15

Dear Reader,

Despite all that needs fixing, there is definitely change in the air. The movement to end the New Jim Crow, the Occupy movement, and the Reintegrative Justice movement are all bringing more public awareness to the issues of systemic racism, corporate abuse, and the failure of punishment to change people. This Thanksgiving I'm going to appreciate the positive things that are happening. I’m also grateful for the many wonderful people who are reading these words in Building Bridges. I’m glad you’re in my life. A special welcome and thank you to all our new members from Mid-Orange’s Governmental Education Organization (GEO), which donated a generous amount of their organization’s remaining funds to Prison Action Network when the prison closed.

There’s a lot of news to report this month; so please be sure to read the Summaries to find out which articles interest you the most. [There's a surprise in Article 10, so make sure you at least check that article out.]

Please be well, keep the faith, share the news, and for everyone’s sake, get involved!

The Editor


SUMMARIES OF ARTICLES IN THIS ISSUE:

1. Gov. Andrew Cuomo will be appointing quite a few judges to the Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals, particularly if he serves two terms. We hope it will lead to more reintegrative sentencing in NYS


2. Calls From Home is a radio program where you can send a message of hope and encouragement to those behind bars in our nation’s prisons, read a short poem, sing a song or send a blessing, speak from your heart to the over 2 million people behind bars this holiday season.


3. Certain Days is a 42-page informational calendar that honors political prisoners.

4. Videos of Senator Perkins and Joseph Jazz Hayden speaking at the Fifth Annual Citizen’s Award Events are available on YouTube. 


5. The Coalition for Women Prisoners invites you to visit their new Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act Campaign interactive website where you can take action and view several advocacy pieces which powerfully reveal the ravages of domestic violence.


6. Decision Fatigue is blamed for conservative parole board decisions in a NY Times Magazine article.


7. Decreased drug crime prison sentences have lowered incarceration numbers by 22 percent in NYS, reports Mary Beth Pfeiffer.


8. Legislation: a report on the progress of the Domestic Violence Survivors’ Justice Act.


9. Minimum Sentences are called “often excessively severe” by the US Sentencing Commission.


10. NYS Parole Reform Campaign continues to gain support; PAN delivered 333 letters from family members and advocates to Gov. Cuomo; Part 2 of “Setting the Record Straight”, The Success of the the Dept. of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) Merger Depends on the Implementation of the SAFE Parole Act. 


11. NYS Prisoner Justice Network premieres the first of its monthly Building Bridges columns.



12. Parole News: Sept. stats around 16%; Merger confusion; "One size fits all" parole decisions continue; Does long incarceration increase public safety?

13. STEPS program gives women hope for life after jail.


14. Ways to get involved: a list of statewide events for a variety of criminal justice causes.

[For copies of any document, article or legislation referred to, or condensed, in this issue, please send an email to PAN with a request clearly stating the number and title of the article and the date it appeared. -Ed.]



1. APPOINTMENTS TO NEW YORK'S HIGHEST COURTS. IN HIS ARTICLE, "SURGE OF OPENINGS WILL ALLOW CUOMO TO SHAPE JUDICIARY", NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL, NOVEMBER 9, 2011, JOHN CAHER REPORTS ON THE DECISIONS THAT GOV. CUOMO WILL BE MAKING IN THE NEAR FUTURE. [John Caher can be contacted at jcaher@alm.com.]



Appellate Division:


Justice A. Gail Prudenti, who presides over the Appellate Division, Second Dept will become the state’s chief administrative judge on Dec 1, thus creating an opening for her current position. A month later Justice Anthony v. Cardona will retire from the Third Dept. The governor can fill two other Appellate Division positions in the First Department, one in the Second Department and another in the Fourth. There is a Supreme Court vacancy in the Tenth Judicial District—Nassau and Suffolk counties—and three Court of Claims posts are available for gubernatorial appointment.


Only elected Supreme Court justices, not acting justices, are eligible for appointment to the Appellate Division.


Court of Appeals Bench:


Mr. Cuomo will have the opportunity to appoint two Court of Appeals Judges his first term, and if he serves a second term he could become the second governor to appoint all seven judges of the high court. The first was his father.
 Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick faces mandatory retirement at the end of 2012. In November 2014, as Mr. Cuomo's first term comes to an end, Judge Victoria A. Graffeo's term expires. On the first day of what could be Mr. Cuomo's second term, two more Court of Appeals seats, those held by Robert S. Smith and Theodore T. Jones, will open due to mandatory retirement. Also in a second term, Mr. Cuomo would appoint a new chief judge at the end of 2015 when Judge Lippman turns 70, the mandatory retirement age. Eugene F. Pigott Jr., turns 70 in 2016 and Susan Phillips Read’s 14-year-term expires at the end of 2017.







2. CALLS FROM HOME: Thousand Kites invites you to participate in a special holiday radio program for prisoners.



Send a message of hope and encouragement to those behind bars in our nation’s prisons. Read a short poem, sing a song or send a blessing. Speak from your heart to the over 2 million people behind bars this holiday season. Your messages will be broadcast on radio stations around the country sending radio waves of hope through prison walls. Call in your message toll free number at (877) 410-4863, or check out www.callsfromhome.org for more information. If you need information about this broadcast contact us via email.team@thousandkites.org

Poets & Spoken Word Artists: We are calling on our poet, writer and creative friends to submit a work to Thousand Kites for our national radio broadcast Calls from Home. Call your poem into our 24/7 answering machine today. Don't worry if you mess up, we edit all the calls. Toll-free at (877) 410-4863 or upload your song directly to our website. We are asking you to submit a work on the themes of incarceration, family, the power to endure and anything that would lift the spirits and spark creativity in our thousands of prisoner listeners. Speak from the heart. You can submit your poem, or read a prisoners poem if you have permission, by calling it into our toll-free line and recording it on our answering machine at toll-free at (877) 410-4863.







3. CERTAIN DAYS: FREEDOM FOR POLITICAL PRISONERS CALENDAR

Today’s struggles against war, capitalism, imperialism and colonialism are rooted in the history of earlier struggles for justice, including the mass movements of the 1960s and 70s. Many political prisoners and prisoners of war of today were organizers during that period, and many of them have been in prison since that time - 30 years or more. Yet these prisoners are not relics of past movements. They are still active in their political work, and despite the hardships of organizing in prison, they continue to organize for justice in the present day: justice behind bars and justice on the streets. The Certain Days: Freedom for Political Prisoners Calendar is our tribute to them. 


Certain Days is a joint fundraising and educational project between outside organizers in Montreal and Toronto and three political prisoners being held in maximum-security prisons in New York State: Herman Bell, David Gilbert and Robert Seth Hayes. The initial project was suggested by Herman in 2001. It has since evolved into a full color 42 page calendar featuring art and writing on a range of social and political issues, and is sold as a fundraiser to support political prisoners in Canada, the USA and Palestine.

 For more information or to get a copy of the calendar ($5 + $3.50 shipping for prisoners) contact us at Certain Days, c/o QPIRG Concordia, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. O., Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada or www.certaindays.org. [All cheques should be made payable to QPIRG Concordia] 





4. FIFTH ANNUAL CITIZENS' AWARDS EVENT - SPEECHES AVAILABLE ON YOUTUBE 



Readers can click here to view the keynote speech by Senator Perkins and Joseph “Jazz” Hayden’s acceptance speech for his Lifetime Achievement Award.



5. THE COALITION FOR WOMEN PRISONERS (CWP): MEDIA IS THE FOCUS OF THIS MONTHS' UPDATES - A WEBSITE, SEVERAL MOVIES AND A DAILY NEWS ARTICLE INCREASE PUBLIC AWARENESS OF THE DEVASTATING IMPACT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

FILM: CWP partnered with the filmmaker of Crime After Crime to co-host two screenings of the film with STEPS to End Family Violence in NYC on November 2nd. It also was screened in Albany under the sponsorship of Prisoners Legal Services. [Building Bridges was in the audience - at a commercial Albany movie theatre - and found it heart breaking and heart warming at the same time. A must-see, if you ever have the opportunity.] Strength of a Woman is a 20-minute documentary created by the Violence Against Women Committee of the Coalition For Women Prisoners and filmmaker Allison Caviness about the experiences, resilience, and strength of formerly incarcerated domestic violence survivors and the devastating impact that the criminal justice system can have on women’s lives. Strength of a Woman is a unique and powerful advocacy tool, which can be used to educate policymakers and the public about these critical issues. You can view the film on the website www.dvsurvivorsjusticeact.org.



WEBSITE: 
The Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act Campaign Website, which was built by Allison Schwartz, DVSJA Campaign Fellow with the Women in Prison Project, provides an opportunity to learn about the bill, share your comments, submit testimony, write your legislator, view multimedia advocacy pieces, follow their blog, and stay abreast of national news about survivor-defendants, and much more! [see more about the Act in Article 8.]



We look forward to seeing you at the next Coalition meeting on Thursday, November 17th from 5:00-7:00pm, at the Correctional Association, 2090 Adam Clayton Powell Jr. Blvd., between 124th & 125th Sts, Suite 200. For more information contact Stacey Thompson, Coalition Associate at: (212)254-5700 ext. 333 or via email at: sthompson@correctionalassociation.org




6. DECISION FATIGUE: THE BEST TIME TO SEE THE PAROLE BOARD IS EARLY IN THE DAY ACCORDING TO AN ARTICLE IN THE AUGUST 21, 2011 NY TIMES SUNDAY MAGAZINE.

In an article titled “Do You Suffer from Decision Fatigue” author John Tierney reports that “Prisoners who appeared early in the morning received parole about 70% of the time while those who appeared late in the day were paroled less than 10% of the times. The mental work of [deciding] case after case, whatever the individual merits, wore them down (the Parole Board).” “No matter how rational and high minded you try to be, you can’t make decision after decision without paying a biological price....eventually your brain looks for shortcuts.” One [shortcut] is “you start to resist any change and potentially risky move - like releasing a prisoner who might commit a crime.” Even the wisest people won’t make good choices when they’re not rested and their glucose is low”. After a snack break the odds of being released increased by about 45 % but dropped again to about 10% just before lunch. Right after lunch it soared again.







7. NYS PRISON POPULATION DROPS BY 22% ACCORDING TO JOURNALIST MARY BETH PFEIFFER IN HER ARTICLE PUBLISHED ON OCT 16 IN THE POUGHKEEPSIE JOURNAL.

Nearly 16,000 fewer minorities serve state time today than in 2000, groups that were hardest hit by the so-called war on drugs. Overall, the prison population declined 22 percent. Among the 50 states, New York charted the biggest drop in its prison rolls in a decade when 37 state prison systems had double-digit population hikes. 
 While pointing out that Hispanics and blacks are still vastly overrepresented in prisons, incarceration experts said the overall figures were impressive.


Nearly 7,700 fewer people of color are incarcerated in state prison in 2011 compared with 2000, the Journal study found. In addition, 35 percent fewer female inmates serve time, and 77 percent fewer women serve drug sentences as their top crime. Inmates were also older by three years on average, according to the analysis, which used databases of the inmate population on one day each in February 2000 and March 2011.


The five boroughs charted a 42 percent decline in sentenced inmates in 2011 compared with 2000; inmates from the rest of the state actually increased 17 percent. Both the city and upstate saw big declines in drug commitments, but the city's decline, 76 percent, was three times that of upstate.


Today, the No. 1 most serious crime of sentenced inmates is second-degree murder, with just over 8,000 convicts -- about the same as in 2000.
 In 2000, the most common top crime for which inmates were incarcerated was third-degree criminal sale of a controlled substance -- with almost 10,000 people sentenced. That's now down to about 3,000.
 With the population shrinking, the state closed three of its then 69 prisons in 2009 and six more as of Oct. 1, with Arthur Kill prison on Staten Island set to close by Dec. 1. Portions of eight other prisons have also been closed since 2009.


The downsizing doesn't impress some reform advocates, who still see the system as hugely bloated, especially with blacks and Hispanics, now 77 percent of inmates, down from 84 percent in 2000.
 "The disparities have diminished somewhat and that's good news, but that does not put us as a state in a place that we can be proud of," said Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, which has opposed city frisking policies as discriminatory. "We were starting at a pretty horrific place from which to decline."
 "The prosecution of drug offenses is still tremendously racially biased," said Jack Beck, a project director for the Correctional Association of New York, which monitors state prisons. Although more whites serve time, he said the proportion "is still grossly out of line with drug use in society."
 "In a time of economic recession it causes a rethinking," said Alan Rosenthal, director of justice strategies for the Center for Community Alternatives, a Manhattan-based sentencing reform group. "We had a shift from tough on crime to smart on crime," an acknowledgement, he added, that high prison rolls did not equate with lower crime.

 [You can reach Mary Beth Pfeiffer at mbpfeiff@poughkeepsiejournal.com].



8. LEGISLATION: THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SURVIVORS JUSTICE ACT (A.7874-A/S.5436)

This bill expands upon the existing provisions of alternative sentencing for domestic violence cases and allows judges the opportunity to re-sentence currently incarcerated persons for offenses in which certain domestic violence criteria was a significant element of the offense. Sponsored by Assemblymember Jeffrion Aubry and Senator Ruth Hassell-Thompson, DVSJA was introduced on May 20, 2011. The legislation is sitting in the codes committee of both houses, and currently has 13 Assembly and 13 Senate co-sponsors. At an advocacy day in Albany on June 7, 140 Coalition for Women Prisoners (CWP) members met with 69 legislators about this bill. Letters in support have been signed by 89 domestic violence and other social justice advocacy groups. [See more about CWP in article 5]



9. MINIMUM SENTENCES ARE OFTEN “EXCESSIVELY SEVERE” SAYS THE U.S. SENTENCING COMMISSION IN ITS LATEST REPORT [read the whole report.]

A 645-page report from the United States Sentencing Commission found that federal mandatory minimum sentences are often “excessively severe,” not “narrowly tailored to apply only to those offenders who warrant such punishment,” and not “applied consistently.” That is especially so for sentences of people convicted of drug-trafficking offenses, who make up more than 75 percent of those given federal mandatory minimum sentences. This is a powerful indictment from the commission, which has three Republicans and three Democrats and operates by consensus. The report shows that harsh mandatory minimums have contributed to the near tripling of federal prisoners in the last 20 years, reaching 208,000 in 2009 and putting federal prisons 37 percent over capacity. The effects of mandatory minimums on repeat offenders are perhaps the harshest. In the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, Congress established five-year minimum terms for “serious” traffickers and 10-year minimums for “major” traffickers, as defined by different quantities for different drugs. But those sentences are often lengthened in any number of ways. A prior conviction for any “felony drug offense”punishable by more than a year, including for simple possession, doubles those terms. Two prior convictions raise the presumption to a mandatory life term. At the same time, there can be great disparity in punishment. Committing the same drug crime can lead to a felony conviction in one state but a misdemeanor in another, which can then lead to widely differing federal sentences. The racial disparities in sentencing are also stark. In some cases, mandatory minimums can be reduced for offenders if the crime did not involve violence or a gun. But most African-American drug offenders convicted of a crime carrying a mandatory minimum sentence could not meet these and other requirements: only 39 percent qualified for a reduction compared with 64 percent of whites. The report notes that inequitable sentencing policies “may foster disrespect for and lack of confidence in the federal criminal justice system.” Not “may.” Given the well-documented unfairness, Congress needs to rescind all mandatory minimum sentences. 

 [New York Times op-ed]



10. NYS PAROLE REFORM CAMPAIGN:

SIXTY-SECOND ORGANIZATION SIGNS IN SUPPORT OF THE SAFE PAROLE ACT
At its meeting on October 23, 2011, New York Quarterly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) endorsed the S.A.F.E. Parole Act. In Friendship, Nancy B. Black, Clerk, New York Quarterly Meeting



PRISON ACTION MEMBERS DELIVER 333 LETTERS TO THE GOVERNOR

On November 8, four members of Prison Action Network delivered 333 letters signed by friends, families, and advocates of our incarcerated members to the governor in support of the SAFE Parole Act. In the photo Mary Kavaney, Assistant Secretary for Public Safety, is accepting the letters on behalf of the governor from Judith Brink, Dir. of PAN. They were joined by Linda King, Joan Card, and a friend of PAN, each of whom told a personal story of how she is affected by the current policy of denying parole based on the nature of the crime. We asked Ms. Kavaney to take our message to Gov. Cuomo:  “Making parole release decisions based on the nature of the crime too frequently results in violent offenders being denied time after time, often resulting in adding 4 to 24 years to their minimum sentences.  These are the people who have the lowest rates of recidivism.  What rational explanation could account for all those denials?  The crime has already been dealt with in the courts.  All we are asking is that the Parole Board base its decisions on the readiness of the individual for reintegration, and if she or he is not deemed ready, letting the parole applicant know how to become so."


SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT, a series of articles presented by the Coalition For Fair Criminal Justice Policies to explain and support the SAFE Parole Act.

Part 2: The Success of the Merger Depends on the Implementation of the SAFE Parole Act, by Larry White (delivered at the NYS Assembly’s Nov. 10 Public Hearing on the DOCCS Merger)

I believe with great conviction that incarcerated individuals are stakeholders in every aspect of the correctional and parole process, and therefore should have meaningful involvement in the operation of the processes that affect their lives and liberties.

The recent legislative changes that were enacted in conjunction with the merger of Dept. of Corrections and Community Supervision and the Division of Parole, including the development of Transitional Accountability Plans and the implementation of Risk and Need Assessment Instrument(s) provide tools that are potentially helpful to refocus the roles of Corrections and Parole in preparation for successful reentry, but completely fail to address the need for those under custody to have direct involvement and input in the very processes that directly affect their release from incarceration.

Although the Transitional Accountability Plan in theory does allow for participation by inmates in the construction of their individualized plan, there is no general policy or directive that requires this. There is also nothing that categorically provides that at every stage of the correctional process the individual inmate shall be informed of exactly what he/she must accomplish or achieve in order to be released on parole. It is this involvement that creates buy in and empowers personal transformation. Without such information the inmate cannot chart a course of involvement in the correctional process that he/she feels certain will lead to successful parole release.

Both the TAP and the Risk and Need Assessment Instrument have the potential to make clear to a person in prison what is expected of him or her and why. Under the TAP, IF the original model is followed, each inmate will participate in the development of their treatment plan, and thus will have a clearer understanding of what they must achieve. That is a very big “if.” The challenge will be whether New York follows the original model, and if line staff can accept a model in which people in prison participate in their own plan.



The Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument and the Transitional Accountability Plan together have the potential to provide each inmate with a clear indication of what is required for successful release to parole and community supervision. Inmates could be informed of these requirements at each stage in the correctional process when the TAP and the Risk and Needs Assessment are updated. Inmate participation in the rehabilitation process is increased when they are informed of what is required for their release from imprisonment and when they have an opportunity to take part in setting those goals. At this stage of the merger it is entirely unclear whether this is how the Tap and Risk and Needs Assessment will be utilized and implemented. I feel compelled to express my doubts and concerns.

Perhaps we need to follow the path of places like Norway and other European countries that have decreased the primacy of punishment and increased the use of proven programmatic approaches to behavioral and cognitive change that lead to law-abiding conduct. The prevailing primacy of punishment that guides our correctional system fails to provide an environment that encourages a personal, stakeholder approach to inmate involvement in the rehabilitative process.



I would like to address the use of Risk and Need Assessment Instruments in the parole release process. Risk assessments are essentially predictions of future behavior and are subject to error. There are no 'laws' of behavior that can be applied to a set of circumstances to determine the behavioral outcome that will follow. Criminal behavior, in particular, is motivated and supported by an unquantifiable number of factors; therefore to assess an individual as 'high risk' is not to say that he or she will indeed recidivate. Despite its shortcomings, risk assessment can, to a certain extent, differentiate offenders who pose a significant risk for re-offending in the future from those who are likely to refrain from committing future offenses. It can also help identify needed support services.

It appears that the risk assessment instrument that DOCCS intends to use will contain “seriousness of the offense” as a factor to determine current dangerousness. From my perspective, the nature of the offense is not a useful tool in determining who should be released and if in fact they are ready for reintegration. The seriousness of the crime has no relevance as a predictor of whether the person will commit that crime again. In addition, the process for utilizing the risk and needs assessment instrument should be transparent. A person appearing before the parole board should be provided with a copy of the scored instrument in advance and the decision should include an explanation of how the instrument was used to make the release decision.

What is sorely missing from the legislation under discussion that accompanies this merger is the requirement that the Board of Parole provide the parole applicant with specific requirements for actions to be taken, programs or accomplishments to be completed, or changes in performance or conduct to be made, or corrective action or actions to be taken, in order to qualify for parole release. As soon as the requirements have been successfully completed and the parole applicant's institutional record has been satisfactory during the time between the previous and current parole board hearing, release shall be granted.



11. NYS PRISONER JUSTICE NETWORK (NYSPJN) AND PRISON ACTION NETWORK (PAN) HAVE JOINED IN A COLLABORATION BY WHICH NYSPJN WILL USE BUILDING BRIDGES AS THEIR WAY OF COMMUNICATING IN PRINT WITH OUR COMBINED MEMBERSHIPS.

Dear Building Bridges Reader,

The New York State Prisoner Justice Network is honored to be invited to write a regular column for Building Bridges. This is column #1.

The Prisoner Justice Network was formed out of the first-ever statewide prisoner justice conference in March of 2010. The conference brought together dozens of organizations and individuals from around the state doing various kinds of prisoner justice work. The participants agreed that mass incarceration is racist and repressive and makes social problems worse, not better. We agreed to form a network to stay in touch with each other, support each other’s work, and share information and inspiration, with the goal of strengthening overall the movement to challenge and change mass incarceration in New York.

Since then, the NYS Prisoner Justice Network has created a number of forms of communication among people challenging New York’s Criminal INjustice System – listserv, website, directory, mailing list, facebook, twitter, regional meetings, regular statewide phone calls. A central part of that communication is with prisoners and their families. They are the experts at the center of the conversation about what needs to change. Many of us NYS Prisoner Justice activists are formerly incarcerated or prison families.

NYS Prisoner Justice is also emerging as an action organization. The largest action to date was the May 2011 Legislative Awareness Day. People came together from all over the state and talked with each other. Then they went in teams to meet with legislators to promote an agenda of change: parole reform, an end to long-term solitary confinement, especially for prisoners with mental illness, and prison closures leading to less incarceration. The focus on parole reform was chosen because it is the issue mentioned most often, and most passionately, by the prisoners who write to NYS Prisoner Justice. The specific issues were framed in the context of a critique of the whole model: mass incarceration is not a solution to social problems. Community healing, not revenge, should be the model. The Legislative Awareness Day helped to get the SAFE Parole Act, for real parole reform, introduced into both houses of the New York State Legislature (though it will still take a lot of work to get it passed). In working toward parole reform, NYS Prisoner Justice is cooperating closely with the NYS Parole Reform Campaign, which developed the SAFE Parole Act and is leading the strategy to get it passed.

Two other important partnerships that NYS Prisoner Justice has been involved in are the Campaign to End the New Jim Crow, a study-group-to-action movement initiated in response to the book, The New Jim Crow, by Michelle Alexander, demonstrating that mass incarceration is the main form of racial oppression in our time; and the Occupy Wall Street movement, where NYSPJN members have started teach-ins on prison issues.

We hope that this column in Building Bridges will give us the opportunity to bring forward issues that are raised by our member organizations and prisoners; will help us communicate better with those who are incarcerated; and will strengthen the movement to end imprisonment and bring about true justice. Contact us at NYSPJN, 33 Central Avenue, Albany NY 12210; nysprisonerjustice@gmail.com; and www.nysprisonerjustice.org.



12. PAROLE NEWS: SEPTEMBER STATS; MERGER CONFUSION; SAME OLD PAROLE BOARD ONE SIZE FITS ALL RELEASE DECISIONS; DOES A LENGTHY INCARCERATION INCREASE PUBLIC SAFETY?

SEPTEMBER 2011 PAROLE BOARD RELEASES – A1 VIOLENT FELONS – DIN #s through 1999 unofficial research from parole database
Total Interviews............... # Released....... # Denied.......... Rate of Release
20 Initials ..........................3.................... 17............ 15%
102 reappearances.......... 17.................... 85............ 16%
122 interviews................. 20.................... 102.......... 16% 


September Initial Releases
Facility.............Sentence..........Offense.........
Clinton............ 16 ½-Life......... Murder 2
Clinton............ 15-Life............ Murder 2
Sing Sing......... 25-Life............ Murder 2

September Reappearance Releases
Facility............ Sentence...........Offense..........# of Board
Arthurkill......... 18-Life............ Murder 2......... 6th
Bare Hill........... 15-Life............ Murder 2......... 9th
Bare Hill........... 20-Life............ Murder 2......... 2nd
Bare Hill........... 15-Life............ Murder 2......... 5th
Clinton............ 1 ½-Life........... Murder 2......... 4th
Fishkill............. 22-Life............ Murder 2......... 4th
Fishkill............. 15-Life............ Murder 2......... 5th
Fishkill............. 15-Life............ Murder 2......... 6th
Fishkill............. 15-Life............ Murder 2......... 3rd
Gouverneur...... 20-Life............ Murder 2......... 2nd
Marcy.............. 25-Life............ Murder 2......... 4th
Midstate.......... 25-Life............ Murder 2......... 9th
Midstate.......... 20-Life............ Murder 2......... 2nd
Mt McGregor.... 20-Life............ Murder 2......... 3rd*for deportation
Taconic............ 20-Life............ Murder 2......... 6th
Woodbourne.... 15-Life............ Murder 2......... 4th


MERGER CONFUSION:

Now that DOCS and the Div. of Parole have merged, at least one ILC has complained about the brief - 10-15 minute - and only, meetings with their facility parole officer 2-3 months prior to their parole board hearings. They complain that the brief interview is not enough time to create a comprehensive parole summary, and too far removed from their interview date. In response they were told that Parole is currently under staffed and they should make sure the information in their quarterly reports is accurate. (These reports can be accessed by a FOIL, we’ve been told.) When we consulted the NYS Parole Handbook on the Parole website for information concerning the role of the Facility Parole Officer, we discovered that the current version was last updated a year ago, before the Merger was even announced. At that time, it said that the “Facility Parole Officer has the responsibility for preparing the status report for your Parole Board appearance, which evaluates your criminal history, as well as all of your accomplishments and adjustments while in prison. The other function of a facility Parole Officer is to counsel and help you prepare for successful reentry into the community.” That information, however, is no longer applicable to the current situation because we don’t know who is responsible for what. Titles have been changed presumably. Or maybe just responsibilities. Maybe guidance counselors are now doing some or all of what facility parole officers used to do. Or maybe the role has been divided up. I suspect the response that was given to the ILC was the best that was possible based on the lack of information available to anyone. Somehow we don’t think we’re the only ones in the dark. [Please let us know if you have anything more definitive to report.]


MR. WINSTON MOSELEY - THE FIRST APPLICANT TO BE EVALUATED UNDER THE CHANGES BY GOV. CUOMO - WAS DENIED PAROLE AND GIVEN A 2 YEAR HIT. ADVOCATES WERE WATCHING CLOSELY TO SEE HOW THE NEW CRITERIA WOULD BE IMPLEMENTED.



Considering the extreme seriousness of his crime and his criminal history, we were interested in what new criteria, if any, the expected denial would be based. On November 1, 2011 the Parole Board was true to form, and issued yet again one of their boiler plate decisions, saying that there is reasonable probability that he would not live and remain at liberty without violating the law and that his release was incompatible with the public safety and welfare the community. They describe the crime in detail, and then note (and commend) his good institutional conduct and his many programs and institutional accomplishments. They also mention the letters of support. Yet they gave no clues as to whether Mr. Moseley will ever be released, or what steps he can take to get out of prison someday. So one size really does fit all in the Board’s opinion, since I have dozens of letters from readers containing parole decisions that are word for word the same as this, with only the details of the crime being different.

 We must continue to work to get the SAFE Parole Act passed, so parole decisions will have some real connection with the individual being interviewed.


IS PUBLIC SAFETY SERVED BY LONGER INCARCERATIONS?

If more prisons was the solution, we should be the safest country in the world. We’re not. The trouble is, there is little evidence that prison has much of a deterrent effect especially for young people who come from poor, crime-ridden neighborhoods with little hope for the future. Prisons have another disadvantage---they are a heavy financial burden. But there are better, more effective, and probably less expensive solutions than just building more prisons and handing out longer sentences.

Everything that criminologists have learned about crime in recent research is that most adolescents who become delinquents, and the overwhelming majority of adults who commit violent crimes, started very young. What researchers have found is that parenting is not a natural instinct. We are losing parenting skills as mobility and divorce sunder families and fifteen-year-olds who did not have proper childhoods of their own have babies. Inadequate parents make children who are more at risk.
 With modern weaponry in the hands of increasingly younger and more desperate children, the rituals of insult and vengeance are a lethal luxury we can no longer afford.

What is needed is not expensive, and is not necessarily liberal or conservative. It is a shift in thinking that begins at home, that teaches that respect comes from within, not from worrying about the opinions of others.
-from the prologue to All God’s Children, by Fox Butterfield



13. 'STEPS' PROGRAM HELPS FREED PRISONERS "RE-ENTER" WORLD, GIVES WOMEN HOPE FOR LIFE AFTER JAIL.

After two decades behind bars, Sharon Richardson is returning to prison – this time without shackles. Richardson is a “reentry specialist” who uses her own experience with incarceration to help former inmates adapt to life on the outside.
 She’ll be taking her work one step further this fall by counseling women still in jail – some who may even be former jail-mates. “I want to help save lives,” said Richardson, 52, who lives in southeast Queens and works for a nonprofit group called STEPS to End Family Violence. “I’m giving back – I have to.” 
For more, readers can access the article by Sam Levin, Daily News if they click here.



14. PLACES TO GO: ACTIONS, EVENTS AND MEETINGS



EVENTS:


BINGHAMTON

Friday November 18, 12 Noon-4PM Southern Tier Social Justice Project and the Broome County Reentry ABLE Program


Making Connections, Restoring Hope, Changing Lives


REENTRY RESOURCE DAY FOR FORMERLY-INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS, THEIR FAMILIES & ALLIES

Food & Drinks will be available.
Questions? Contact Cheryl DeRosa (607) 727-0438 or Jeff Pryor (607) 778-1364

Location: Broome County Library, Exhibit Room, 2nd Floor 59 Court Street, Binghamton
_____________________

MANHATTAN Events

WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 16, 1-3PM NY Reentry roundtable “policing the police: the need for sweeping reform now!” Guest Speaker Robert Gangi, Dir. Police Reform Organizing Project, Senior Policy Advocate, Urban Justice Center. Please RSVP to Gabriel Torres Rivera, J.D. grivera@cssny.org.

Location: Community Service Society of NY (CSS)
105 East 22nd St., cnr Park Ave So. Conf. Rm 4A Take 6 or W/R to 23rd St.


__________
THURSDAY NOVEMBER 1 (9AM - 5PM) COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY POLCY FORUM
Whatever it Takes; Strategies for Preventing Youth Disconnection 

Speaker: Bryan Samuels, Commissioner, Administration for Children Youth and Families, US Dept of Health and Human Services. 

For more information please contact smetzger@cssny.org 
Location: the NYC Bar Association, 42 W. 44th St.
__________


SATURDAY DECEMBER 3, 1PM THE NATIONAL ACTION NETWORK 
DEATH PENALTY FORUM
“WE ARE ALL STILL TROY DAVIS!”
presented by the Political Action Committee/Second Chance Committee.
For more information: Dawn 917 557 0109, Brenda 917 723 4378, Victor, 646 229 9869

Location: House of Justice, 106 W. 145th St., #3 train or 19 Bus to 145th St.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
MEETINGS:

ALBANY
DECEMBER 12 & EVERY SECOND MONDAY, 6PM THE UPSTATE CAMPAIGN TO END THE NEW JIM CROW
“NO TO PRISONS, YES TO CARING COMMUNITIES”
Call 518 427 8361 for details
Location: The Book Club, 153 S. Pearl St.
__________________

BUFFALO meeting
MONDAY NOVEMBER 28, 6:30-8:30PM PRISONERS ARE PEOPLE TOO, INC.

Prisoners Are People Too, Inc. is a justice advocacy initiative that meets on the last Monday of every month. Most meetings feature a documentary film, related to some criminal justice issue, prison issue or reentry challenge and one or more guest speakers.

At the next monthly meeting of Prisoners Are People Too, Inc., we will meet some formerly incarcerated people who have established successful businesses in Western New York. They will discuss the hardships of imprisonment, the challenges of reintegration, and the obstacles they faced in seeking to establish a legitimate business while dealing with the collateral consequences of a criminal conviction. Mr. Alfonzo Carter will tell his story and introduce us to “Electronic Outlet” which is located in Buffalo’s Elmwood Village. Mr. Guy Lane will introduce us to his restaurant, named after his baby daughter, “Nadia’s Taste of Soul.” A third speaker is unconfirmed at this printing.

The Circle of Supporters for Reformed Offenders and Friends of BaBa Eng are the sponsors of PRP2, Inc. programs. For further information, contact Karima Amin: 716-834-8438 or karima@prisonersarepeopletoo.org.

Location:Pratt-Willert Community Center, 422 Pratt Street
____________________

MANHATTAN meetings
THURSDAY NOVEMBER 17, 5-7PM COALITION FOR WOMEN PRISONERS MEETING

Updates by the Conditions/Reentry Committee on our efforts to monitor implementation of the Dept. of Health oversight law and our work on the housing booklet for women returning home.

Discussion with Kathy Boudin on issues facing long-termers and ways to ensure justice for all.

More info: Jaya Vasandani, 212.254.5700, x334, jvasandani@correctionalassociation.org

Location: Correctional Association of NY, 2090 Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. Blvd.


THURSDAY DECEMBER 1, 6:30PM THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY

What is happening at the jails on Rikers Island and other city jails?
*23-Hour Confinement in “The Box”,
*Inadequate Mental Health Treatment,
*Brutality,
*Mistreatment


Are you concerned about the NYC jails? Do you have ideas about how to organize to stop the abuse and trauma? 
Let’s get together to talk about it, organize around it, and change it! 


Contact Jennifer at jparish@urbanjustice.org or 646.602.5644, or Randi at 718.508.3413

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SUPPORT GROUP MEETINGS
ALBANY: Every Monday 7-8:30PM Prison Families of NY Support Group Meetings Alison 518-453-6659
Every Tuesday at 6PM P-MOTIONS (Progressive Men Operating Towards Initiating Opportunities Now)
Malik at 518-445-5487.

BROOKLYN:
Every Wednesday 5:30PM VOCAL Parolees Organizing Project.
For more info call 917 676-8041

LONG ISLAND:
2nd and 4th Tuesdays of the month: November 22 and December 13, 7:30PM Prison Families Anonymous meetings The Community Presbyterian Church 1843 Deer Park Avenue, Deer Park, NY

First Tuesday of the month, December 6, 7:30PM at St Brigids Catholic Church, 75 Post Ave, Westbury, NY.
For information, please contact: Barbara: 631-943-0441 or Sue: 631-806-3903

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Building Bridges is published by Prison Action Network as a way of communicating with our members.
If you would like to join, please give us a call or send an email

Thursday, October 13, 2011

OCTOBER 2011












WE POST LATE BREAKING NEWS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS HERE DURING THE MONTH. TO GO DIRECTLY TO THE OCTOBER ISSUE OF BUILDING BRIDGES, PLEASE SCROLL DOWN.




*******************************************************
Pardons: The Power Nobody Wants
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
6 p.m. - 7:30 p.m.

The New School
John L. Tishman Auditorium
66 West 12 Street
New York City

The Hon. Dennis Jacobs, chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and a distinguished panel of experts explore the history and real-world application of the power of pardon at the state and federal level. Following opening remarks by New School president David E. Van Zandt, Judge Jacobs explains the history of the power, its role in correcting injustice in the application of criminal law, and the way the decline in its use reflects a missed opportunity, lack of imagination, and failure of courage.

Our panel then examines the critical historical, legal, economic, and ethical issues surrounding the pardon power and the implications of its greater or lesser use. Panelists include:

Moderator: Senator Bob Kerrey, President Emeritus, The New School.

*Hon. Dennis Jacobs, Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
*Hon. Robert L. Ehrlich, Senior Counsel, King & Spalding; former Governor of Maryland; former Congressman (R-MD), U.S. House of Representatives.
*JulieStewart, Attorney; President and Founder, Families Against Mandatory Minimums.
*Margaret Colgate Love, Attorney; former Pardon Attorney, Office of the Pardon Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice.
*Anthony Papa, Manager, Media Relations, Drug Policy Alliance; clemency recipient following imprisonment for first-time, nonviolent drug offense under New York’s draconian Rockefeller Drug Laws.

For details click here.




October 15 2011

Dear Reader,

My colleagues and I talk a lot about reintegration. But what is it, really? What does reintegration feel like? I think it’s when a person feels welcome and accepted by the community, and the community feels safe and enriched by the person. It doesn’t happen overnight. Trust takes time. Simply put, when it’s there it feels great! It’s comfortable. Trust makes you feel expansive and generous; good about yourself. Its opposites, fear and distrust, alienate a person, shrink one’s comfort zone. How to shift from the latter paradigm to the reintegrative way is the question. Let’s look at the current situation:


 No one ever describes prisons as trusting places. Prisoners don’t trust other prisoners. Prison staff don’t trust prisoners, and prisoners have little but anger and distrust for the guards. Of course there are exceptions, but the prison culture does not encourage them. The guards and the prisoners do not think of themselves as being on the same side and thus they each feel they need to show how tough they are in order to survive, which sets up a get-even mentality. When families and friends visit prison they experience similar treatment from the staff: they don’t trust us, and so we don’t trust them, even at their friendliest, because they treat us as if we are trying to get away with something. Bringing in a piece of paper with writing on it is wrong; a sweater with a hood can be wrong. Hugging and kissing are wrong. It’s always about what we are doing wrong - things that usually aren’t considered wrong anywhere else. If that’s how we’re treated, how can we think our loved ones aren’t treated worse?

Then there’s the Parole Board, which is suspicious of parole applicants and worried they will go out and commit another crime. Parole applicants are afraid the Board won’t ever release them, and there’s nothing they can do about it. How can a person change their behavior and their thinking if they’re not given proper guidance? The Board would rather decide how long they need to be punished, it would seem from the many parole denial decisions we’ve read.

None of this helps reintegration. After 10, 20, 30 years of living with fear, anger, and distrust, how does a person walk out the gate and feel welcome and accepted by their community? And if you don’t feel welcomed and accepted how do you feel caring and generous in return? When the community parole officer says you can’t take a job you were offered because you have to take a program you taught in prison, how can you feel like they have your best interest in mind? (see Article 8 by Lawrence Hayes for more examples.)

You may be wondering why I am stating the obvious. Of course there’s no trust between the good guys and the bad guys, you might say! But it depends on where you’re situated who you think is good and who you think is bad. And anyway, shouldn’t we all be on the same side? Of course we should! We all want to feel safe. Safe is having enough food, a roof over our head, access to a good education and adequate health care, people who want the best for us and faith that those things won’t be taken away from us. Isn’t that what everyone wants?

I dream of a world where reintegration not only is the goal, but where very few of us ever need to reenter because we never left. To build that world, we all need to understand we are on the same side. If we treated others as we want to be treated, so much would change. We would have a truly correctional system instead of a penal system, and it would be focused on helping people become the best they can be, not on punishing them. Punishment is proven to be an ineffective way of motivating a person to do better. In the reintegrative system of my dreams, prisoners would be able to look to guards for guidance. Parole Boards would evaluate whether the person’s behavior and thinking had changed and if not, provide specific means to achieve the necessary changes. Community Parole officers would be actually helping their clients find community support in the form of jobs, housing, education, food, health care instead of threatening them with prison if they fail to find those things for themselves. This is the world I am not only dreaming of but working toward. “You may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one.” (John Lennon). I know a lot of you have the same dream. Let’s make it happen! Starting (but not ending) with the SAFE Parole Act. Visit www.parolereform.org to tell your story, or write to your legislators!

Please be well, keep the faith, share the news, and for everyone’s sake, get involved! The Editor

P.S. On Saturday September 24, The National Symposium Think Outside the Cell “A New Day, A New Way" was host to hundreds at Riverside Church.  Videos of much of it on are available on Youtube


SUMMARIES OF ARTICLES:
1. Prison Children Anonymous: Children who have or once had a parent, sibling or loved one involved in the criminal justice system, now have a place to receive emotional support and learn about our penal system.

2. Citizens Against Recidivism 5th Annual Citizens’ Awards Event, Saturday November 5th, is at a new location this year: TIAN, 679 Riverside Dr. Join the PAN table for a reduced ticket price.

3. Formerly Incarcerated and Convicted People’s Movement (FICPM) announces a national conference to discuss and ratify a National Agenda to restore their civil and human rights.

4. The Coalition for Women Prisoners, a project of the Women in Prison Project, invites readers to help make the criminal justice system more responsive to the needs and rights of women and their families.

5. The Free Bus Program was recently eliminated by NYS DOCCS. Please help bring it back by taking the “Bring Back the Buses” Survey.

6. Legislation: Despite rumors, there is no law releasing inmates after 65% of their sentence is served, The SAFE Parole Act was not voted on by the Senate ‘s Crime Victims, Crime and Correction Committee, and only 4 of the 26 bills reported on in Building Bridges were voted on by any body. None of them became law.

7. NYS Parole Reform Campaign: Response to Philip Genty’s article on Exec. Law §259-i revisions by the governor (see Sept. Building Bridges). More than 210 letters to the Governor in support of the SAFE Parole Act have been gathered by hardworking readers. Good work, team!

8. Parole News: August releases, first use of revised Parole Board policies, comments from a stakeholder.

9. Youth Justice: New York State is one of only two states in the country (the other is North Carolina) where every 16 and 17 year old is automatically tried as an adult. Judge Lippman calls for raising the age.  



10. Things you can do to become educated and/or involved exist across the state, in Albany, Binghamton, Brooklyn, Buffalo, Long Island, Manhattan and White Plains.

[For copies of any document, article or legislation referred to, or condensed, in this issue, please send an email to PAN with a request clearly stating the number and title of the article and the date it appeared. -Ed.]


1. PRISON CHILDREN ANONYMOUS IS FORMING TO HELP CHILDREN WHO NOW HAVE OR ONCE HAD A PARENT, SIBLING OR LOVED ONE INVOLVED IN THE PENAL SYSTEM.

PCA is in pilot stage while it tries to find private and public funding. Its first meeting was held on Tuesday, October 11, at The Community Presbyterian Church, 1843 Deer Park Avenue in Deer Park, New York.
PCA meets once a month on the second Tuesday so children can share their experiences, feelings and hopes with each other. The parent group, Prison Families Anonymous, meets at the same time in another room and parents and guardians of children are encouraged to join that group while the children’s group is in session.
Along with providing emotional support, PCA educates children about the criminal justice system, about jails and prisons, about re-entry issues, about pending legislation and about resources they might not be aware of.
Details are listed below, in Article 10, last page, under L.I. Support Groups.
For more information please e-mail PCA or visit Facebook by searching “Prison Children Anonymous”. Visit the parent’s website for more information as well at www.PF-LI.com.



2. CITIZENS AGAINST RECIDIVISM 5TH ANNUAL CITIZENS' AWARDS EVENT

This gala event presents awards to people who did time for a crime and have shown that they were not only safe to release, but that their release has benefitted their communities (who nominated and voted for them).

Keynote address by NYS Senator Bill Perkins; Light dining provided.   

Prison Action Network never misses this event, and as usual we invite you to join our table for a reduced price. Send your check or money order for $45. to Prison Action Network, PO Box 6355, Albany NY 12206 by October 28, and you’ll be on the list at the door.

Advance Tickets through Citizens Against Recidivism: $55.  ($60 at the door).
For more information: click here.

Saturday November 5th, doors open at 6pm
Location:  TIAN, 679 Riverside Dr. (at W.145th St. in the Riverbank State Park) 



3. FORMERLY INCARCERATED AND CONVICTED PEOPLE’S MOVEMENT (FICPM) ANNOUNCES NATIONAL CONFERENCE

On Thursday, November 2, 8:30AM-6PM in Los Angeles, formerly-incarcerated and convicted people and their allies from all over the United States will convene to discuss and ratify a National Agenda to restore their civil and human rights. They plan to mount unified national campaigns to register voters, end all forms of discrimination based on arrest or conviction records, to support the human rights of people locked up in cages, and to serve their families and communities.

PLEASE REGISTER NOW to attend the November 2 conference in Los Angeles.

If you have any questions about the FICPM Strategy Session, please contact: Aaliyah: 916-501-9988  -OR- Fanya: 562-688-0472 -OR- click here.



4. THE COALITON FOR WOMEN PRISONERS

At the September 15th Coalition For Women Prisoners meeting, the Incarcerated Mothers’ Committee reported on their implementation activities around the NY Adoption and Safe Families Act Expanded Discretion Law (ASFA), which was passed on June 15, 2010.

If you would like to learn how to help ensure that incarcerated parents can benefit from this law, please contact Stacey at (212) 254-5700 Ext. 333 or sthompson@correctionalassociation.org. 


Upcoming Coalition events:
*

October 21st: The activities of the Violence Against Women Committee will be highlighted at this Coalition meeting.

*We are gearing up for our December Coalition Holiday Event [date to be announced], where we will be sending letters to women on the inside.




5. THE FREE BUS PROGRAM WAS RECENTLY ELIMINATED BY NYS DOCCS



This program provided monthly free buses to NY State prisons -- many of which are very far from NYC and inaccessible by public transportation.  Buses also left from upstate areas to help family members visit their loved ones incarcerated in downstate prisons. 

 The NY Initiative for Children of Incarcerated Parents, coordinated by the Osborne Association, is launching a BRING BACK THE BUSES campaign. As part of this campaign, the Initiative is collecting surveys from family members and people who have used the “Free Bus Program.”

The survey is available here. 



No computer? You can contact 718-637-6597 or -6587 for copies of the survey or to arrange to fill out the survey over the phone with someone. You can help ensure that families’ voices are heard and that the free DOCCS buses -- which help keep families connected, reduce the trauma of incarceration and support successful reentry -- are brought back! 

 Call Osborne's Family Resource Center toll-free at 1-800-344-3314 for support, info about related upcoming events and organizing efforts around bringing back the buses.



6. LEGISLATION RUMORS DISPELLED:

Recently we received a copy of a letter sent to interested parties that corrected rumors and misinformation about 2011 criminal justice bills, particularly to discredit the cruel rumor that there was a new law effective Nov 2011 releasing certain inmates after they had served 65% of their sentence.  (Another reader told us that rumor had surfaced many times during his 30 years in prison.) 



However the letter itself contained some erroneous information, which we want to set right.

Let me start by saying it’s very easy to be confused - the legislative process is difficult to comprehend.  The information is not widely distributed; thousands of bills are introduced every year and most of them never see the light of day.  To discover all the bills that might be of interest would require a lot of effort.  We rely heavily on word of mouth information from our allies in the advocacy world who are supporting or opposing specific bills on matters we know will be of interest to our members. If you already know about a bill, the legislative website is a useful tool for finding out more about it.

One bill we do know a lot about is the SAFE Parole Act.  We are part of the NYS Parole Reform Campaign which is working hard to get it passed.  The SAFE Parole Act was not voted on in the Senate’s Crime Victims, Crime and Correction Committee. The next session begins in January, and it will need to be reintroduced in the Senate, where bills expire after a year otherwise.  With 3 sponsors in the Senate, we feel very hopeful that at least one of them will want to reintroduce it in January.   The Assembly keeps bills for 2 years, after which they too need to be reintroduced. The SAFE Parole Act will go into the next session with all four of its Assembly sponsors still in place.  We will be sure to inform readers when it is voted on by either committee.

Not all of the criminal justice bills referred to in the July Building Bridges were voted on by the legislature (that word is usually used to refer to both houses).  Those 26 bills were introduced this year in the Assembly’s Correction Committee and/or the Senate’s Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections Committee. Only the following four were voted on: 

S338/A154 Merit Time and S107/A5355 Educational Opportunities were both introduced and defeated by a vote of the Senate Committee. 

S3645 /A7015-B “Brittany’s Law”: VFO Registry,  and S3747/A8478- "FRP Bill" were the only bills among the 26 that were voted on and passed by the Senate.  Neither have been voted on by the Assembly.

Before a bill becomes a law it must 1) be presented to both houses, 2) have been passed by both houses, and 3) be signed by the governor. Not one of the 26 have passed those 3 hurdles, so none have become laws. (See Building Bridges June and July 2011 for more details about the bills.)



7. NYS PAROLE REFORM CAMPAIGN

SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT, a series of articles presented by the Coalition For Fair Criminal Justice Policies to explain and support the SAFE Parole Act.

Part 1: Why We Need To Continue Working For Passage Of The Safe Parole Act

In his September 1, 2011 New York Law Journal article, Professor Philip Genty shares with readers his optimism for parole reform, as he attempts to interpret the legislative change enacted by the Governor’s March 31, 2011 budget bill.  If that optimism depends upon the good will of the parole board to write procedures heralding a new day for parole reform, should we share that hope?
 
If Professor Genty is correct in his prognostication, we say “hurrah!”  But there is substantial room for skepticism, and it is that skepticism that is the basis for the need for supporters of real parole reform to continue to demand sweeping change.  It is important to understand what the legislative change did and did not do—and why now is the time to push for the real reform proposed by the SAFE Parole Act (A.7939 and S.5374).
 
The statutory change that has generated this optimism is a re-write of Executive Law§ 259-c(4). It says that the parole board shall:
 
establish written [guidelines] PROCEDURES for its use in making parole decisions as required by law[, including the fixing of minimum periods of imprisonment or ranges thereof for different categories of offenders]. Such written [guidelines may consider the use of a] PROCEDURES SHALL INCORPORATE risk and needs [assessment instruments] PRINCIPLES to MEASURE THE REHABILITATION OF PERSONS APPEARING BEFORE THE BOARD, THE LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS OF SUCH PERSON UPON RELEASE, AND assist members of the state board of parole in determining which inmates may be released to parole supervision.
 ( [ ] = deleted from original; CAPS = added to original)

It should be noted that there was also a rewrite of Executive Law § 259-I, which contains the factors that the parole board must consider. These factors remain exactly the same as they were, except for their repositioning within the statute. They continue to include the very static factor “the seriousness of the offense...” This factor and all of the other factors are still required to be considered under the new procedures that are still to be written.
 
So, here we are six months after the enactment of this hope-generating statute, and neither the procedures nor the risk and needs assessment instrument have been implemented. Yet it is these, as yet unwritten, procedures that Professor Genty would have us pin our hopes on. It doesn’t seem like a good time to sit back with our fingers crossed in hopes that the parole board will inject real reform into the still to be written procedures.
 
The SAFE Parole Act doesn’t leave the practical implementation of reform to the vagaries of the parole board and the hope that it will write reform-minded procedures. The SAFE Parole Act contains the procedures for implementation right in the statutory proposal itself.
 
Unlike the budget bill, the SAFE Parole Act would do the following:

A) Remove from parole consideration “the seriousness of the offense,” leaving that consideration exclusively to the sentencing court.
 
B) Add the requirement that the parole board must consider the parole applicant’s preparedness for reentry and reintegration, as evidenced by the applicant’s institutional record pertaining to program goals and accomplishments as stated in the facility performance reports, academic achievements, vocational education, training or work assignments, therapy and interactions with staff and other sentenced persons, and other indications of pro-social activity, change and transformation.
 
C) Add the requirement that the parole board consider the progress made towards achieving the programming and treatment needs developed in the transitional accountability plan.
 
D) Add the requirement that if parole is not granted the parole board will state in detail and not in conclusory terms the factors and reasons for the denial and the specific requirements for actions to be taken, programs or accomplishments to be completed, or changes in performance or conduct to be made, or corrective action or actions to be taken, in order to qualify for parole release.
 
E) Add the requirement that if parole is not granted the Department shall, within ninety days of the hearing decision, provide the parole applicant access to the program or programs, activities and/or facilities needed in order to provide the opportunity to fulfill the requirements set forth by the board.
 
F) Add the requirement that if the requirements previously set forth by the parole board at the time of denial have been successfully completed and the parole applicant’s institutional record has been satisfactory during the time between the previous and current parole hearing, release shall be granted.
 
G) The parole applicant shall be entitled to a copy of the scored risk and needs assessment.
 
These are but a few of the provisions that the SAFE Parole Act would require if enacted.
 
We have two choices. 

We can sit back and hope that the parole board writes procedures for itself that adopt the requirements of the SAFE Parole Act, and thus prove true Professor Genty’s prognosis that these procedures may “be the most significant parole reform in more than 30 years. 

Or we can continue to do the hard work of organizing for legislative change and passage of the SAFE Parole Act.


SPEAKING OF DOING HARD WORK: A big thumbs up to all the readers who have done great work gathering signatures on a letter to Governor Cuomo requesting his support of the SAFE Parole Act! So far more than 210 letters have been returned to us! As soon as we can finish sorting them by zip code, so we can also inform senators and assembly members of the numbers from their districts who have signed, we will hand deliver them to the governor’s office. We hope to do that before November, so please try to get as many additional letters as possible to the Campaign by Oct. 21. (The address appears in the footer of the letter.)



8. PAROLE NEWS: AUGUST STATS; PAROLE BOARD REQUIRED CREDENTIALS; REVISED 259-I TO GO INTO EFFECT IN NOV.; PAROLE SUPERVISION AS SEEN FROM A STAKEHOLDER’S PERSPECTIVE.

AUGUST 2011 PAROLE BOARD RELEASES – A1 VIOLENT FELONS – DIN #s through 1999
Unofficial research from parole database

TOTAL INTERVIEWS.. # RELEASED. # DENIED... RATE OF RELEASE
17 Initials. .......................3....................... 14............ 18%
94 reappearances..... ......16...................... 78............ 17%
111 interviews.......................19...................... 92............ 17%

AUGUST INITIAL RELEASES
FACILITY.......... SENTENCE.........OFFENSE........ # OF BOARD
Arthurkill......... 20-Life............ Murder 2.............Initial
Clinton............ 15-Life............ Murder 2.............Initial
Greenhaven..... 17-Life............ Att Murder 1.......Initial

AUGUST REAPPEARANCES
FACILITY......... SENTENCE.....OFFENSE.........# OF BOARD
Arthurkill .........15-Life........Murder2.................2nd
Arthurkill .........15-Life........Murder 2................5th
Elmira...............25-Life........Murder pre-74.......9th
Fishkill..............22-Life........Murder 2................3rd
Fishkill..............15-Life........Murder 2................3rd
Fishkill..............25-Life........Murder pre-74.......8th
Fishkill..............15-Life........Murder 2................2nd
Franklin.............20-Life........Murder 2...............7th ?
Franklin.............15-Life........Murder 2...............3rd
Greenhaven.......25-Life........Murder 2...............3rd
Marcy................15-Life........Murder 2...............6th
Southport .........20-Life........Murder 2...............8th
Wende...............25-Life........Murder 2...............7th ?
Woodbourne.....15-Life........Murder 2................5th
Woodbourne.....18-Life........Murder 2................7th
Wyoming...........15-Life........Murder 2...............6th


PAROLE BOARD MAKEUP AS STATED IN EXECUTIVE LAW § 259.:
§ 259-b. State board of parole; organization.

1. There shall be in the state division of parole a state board of parole which shall possess the powers and duties hereinafter specified. Such board shall consist of not more than nineteen members appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of senate. The term of office of each member of such shall be for six years; provided, however, that any member chosen to a vacancy occurring otherwise than by expiration of term shall be appointed for the remainder of the unexpired term of the member whom he is to succeed. In the event of the inability to act of any member, the governor may appoint some competent informed person to act in his stead during the continuance of such disability.
2. Each member of the board shall have been awarded a degree from an accredited four-year college or graduate degree from college or university or accredited graduate school and shall have had at least five years of experience in one or more of the fields of criminology, administration of criminal justice, law enforcement, sociology, law, social work, corrections, psychology, psychiatry or medicine.
3. The governor shall designate one of the members of the board as chairman to serve in such capacity at the pleasure of the governor or until the member's term of office expires and a successor is designated in accordance with law, whichever first occurs.
4. The members of the state board of parole shall not hold any other public office; nor shall they, at any time of their appointment nor during their incumbency, serve as a representative of any political party on an executive committee or other governing body thereof, nor as an executive officer or employee of any political committee, organization or association.
5. Each member of the state board of parole shall receive for his services an annual salary to be fixed by the governor within the amount appropriated therefor. Each member of such board shall also receive his necessary expenses actually incurred in the discharge of his duties.
6. Any member of the state board of parole may be removed by the governor for cause after an opportunity to be heard.
7. Except as otherwise provided by law, a majority of the state board of parole shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of all business of the board.


MR. WINSTON MOSELEY WILL BE AMONG THE FIRST INMATES EVALUATED UNDER THE REVISED SYSTEM WHEM HE MEETS THE PAROLE BOARD THE WEEK OF OCT. 31. 


Excerpts from a Sept. 30, 2011 article in the NY Law Journal by John Caher.
[all emphases added]


For the first time since he became eligible for parole in 1984, Mr. Moseley will appear before a parole board that now is being directed to look beyond his crime and criminal record, and consider if the 76-year-old who committed hideous crimes 47 years ago is the same person [now] seeking freedom. 


...Executive Law §259(c) requires the parole board to establish and apply "risk and needs principles to measure the rehabilitation of persons appearing before the board" and the likelihood of success should the offender be released. In the past, the board "could" consider those factors; as of today it "must" consider them. 


Mr. Moseley will be among the first inmates evaluated under the revised system when he meets the parole board the week of Oct. 31. 


The risk assessment tool is under development and is expected to be in use by November, according to Peter K. Cutler, a spokesman for the new Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, which was created this year through the merger of the prison and parole system. 


Advocates welcome the new paradigm and are eagerly awaiting the first batch of parole board determinations based on the revised standards.


Robert N. Isseks, an attorney in Middletown who has for years pursued a federal class action alleging that the parole board ignores current criteria and effectively acts as a re-sentencing body, said he has doubts. ..."I'd like to be optimistic," Mr. Isseks said. "I hope [the new law] will force them to do what they are supposed to do, but I can't predict. In the hundreds of decisions I have seen, there is plenty of reason to be skeptical." 
The 2006 federal case filed by Mr. Isseks in the Southern District, Graziano v. Pataki, 7:06-cv-00480, was dismissed last December by Judge Cathy Seibel. Mr. Isseks is appealing and also attempting to reinstate a state court action pending before the Appellate Division, Third Department. Mr. Isseks said the new requirements may put a heavier burden on the parole board to establish that it has performed more than a cursory review. "These new guidelines might help the judges make more informed decisions, and give them something more to look at and consider," Mr. Isseks said.


Ms. JoAnne Page [CEO, Fortune Society] agreed. "This provides grounds for challenging a parole board hit on the basis of not having looked at evidence of rehabilitation or not having administered a recent risk assessment," she said. "It opens doors, provides a basis from which to challenge [a denial of parole]. It is a step in the right direction, and something that has been needed for many, many years." Ms. Page said the new criteria may force the parole board to consider that A-1 felons released on parole are at an extremely low risk of re-offending. In fact, state figures show that offenders who serve a sentence for murder are the least likely to commit a felony once they are paroled. "People change," Ms. Page said. "If there is anything I know from my 22 years heading Fortune, it is that people who have been menaces to the community have the capacity to become good neighbors and make a positive difference in the world. And the people who committed the most horrific crimes and served decades [in prison] are beyond the age when people tend to recidivate."

John Caher can be contacted at jcaher@alm.com.




THE NEW YORK STATE PAROLE SYSTEM MUST BE ABOLISHED by Lawrence Hayes

I have a 9pm curfew and can't leave the five boroughs of New York City without consent. I report to a parole office every month and their approach with me is to consistently obstruct to my reintegration, EVEN WHEN THEY SEEM COMPASSIONATE AND UNDERSTANDING. I can’t maintain lasting friendships because I can’t be out past 9pm and I can’t be spontaneous and join them to attend an event or visit anyone outside of New York City.  Intimate relationships end quickly mostly because it’s a frightening experience for any woman who loves you, because (especially with political me) your lady friend and family is always fearful of you going back to prison.


My 17-year old daughter often expresses her dislike and distain for the parole system because she sees what it does to me.  She can be out past 9am, but her daddy can’t.


Parole does more to interfere with working than it does to help. Too many times, I’ve been ordered to “report” first thing in the morning when the parole officer should know it affects my paycheck.  Every penny less than my full week’s salary can mean less food for my daughter and me, or prevent me from doing my laundry; it can prevent me from paying someone back who lent money for the week’s unlimited transit card, etc.  


It would seem to me that after 20 years of no police contact it’s pretty clear I’m not a criminal or a risk to society, especially since I’ve always maintained work and a place to stay. The irony of it all is that, in New York City, there are a disproportionate number of African-American parole officers; talk about participating in conspiracies against ourselves?


In summary, as currently constituted, the parole system serves no useful purpose. Somewhere in the area of 45 percent of the New York prison population consists of parolees.  Is that their idea of success?  If, as stated on their website, their mission is to promote public safety by preparing inmates for release and supervising parolees to the successful completion of their sentence, they have a dismal record.  My success has been limited by them, not expanded.  I am surviving.  I could be thriving, if they really had my - and my community's - best interests at heart.




9. YOUTH JUSTICE: JUDGE LIPPMAN, CHIEF JUDGE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND CHIEF JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS, RECENTLY GAVE A SPEECH CALLING FOR NEW YORK STATE TO RAISE THE AGE OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY.

New York State is one of only two states in the country (the other is North Carolina) where every single 16 and 17 year old is automatically tried as an adult.  “The judge is proposing that the state transfer jurisdiction for 16- and 17-year-olds accused of less serious crimes to family courts, which have more social services, while continuing to prosecute the most violent juveniles as adults. The plan reflects an emerging consensus in many states that troubled teenagers have been mishandled by the adult court system.” Read article in 9/21 NY Times




10. PLACES TO GO: ACTIONS, EVENTS AND MEETINGS

EVENTS
ALBANY
SUNDAY OCTOBER 16TH, 6:00 PM SOCIAL JUSTICE CENTER FILM SPECIAL!!

COINTELPRO 101, WITH FILMMAKER CLAUDE MARKS. Mr. Marks will be present and will talk with the audience about the legacy of Cointelpro today

Sponsored by the Social Justice Center of Albany, the Albany Political Prisoner Support Committee, and the Capital District Solidarity Committee. $4 donation at the door to cover expenses requested but not required.

Location: Social Justice Center, 33 Central Ave, Albany (wheelchair accessible.)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BINGHAMTON event
SAVE THE DATE: FRIDAY NOVEMBER 18, 12 Noon-4PM Southern Tier Social Justice Project and the Broome County Reentry ABLE Program

Making Connections, Restoring Hope, Changing Lives
REENTRY RESOURCE DAY FOR FORMERLY-INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS, THEIR FAMILIES & ALLIES

Food & Drinks will be available. Questions? Contact Cheryl DeRosa (607) 727-0438 or Jeff Pryor (607) 778-1364

Location: Broome County Library, Exhibit Room, 2nd Floor 59 Court Street
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BROOKLYN event
WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 19, 4:30-7:00 PM The Osborne Association

SHARING OUR STRENGTHS’ SUPPORT GROUP
Presents Dr. Michael Willett, author of Man by Choice, Male by Birth 
Book signing & in-depth, involved TALK, Refreshments Served
For more info or call 718-637-6560

Location: 175 Remsen Street (8th Flr Conference Rm) Brooklyn
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

MANHATTAN events

TUESDAY OCTOBER 18, 6:00-7:30 PM The Dangerous Over-Use of Solitary Confinement: 
Pervasive Human Rights Violations in Prisons, Jails & Other Places of Detention


Keynote Address by JUAN E. MENDEZ, Special Rapporteur of the Human Rights Council on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment with Panel discussion.


Location: Church Center for the United Nations, 777 United Nations Plaza, NYC
, 44th Street Entrance – Second Floor Conference Room


THURSDAY OCTOBER 20, 6-8PM New York Task Force on Racial Disparity 
Community Awareness and Connection Event:
A community meeting to learn about campaigns and coalitions working to stop the rail to jail in NYC.  Find out what other groups in NYC are working on and how it relates to you.

Location:  Center for Community Alternatives, 39 W. 19th Street, (Betw 5th and 6th Ave) 10th Floor



WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 2, 5:30-8 PM Center for Community Alternatives (CCA) & NYU Wagner Students for Criminal Justice Reform present

REINTEGRATIVE JUSTICE FORUM


Discussants: SOFIYAH ELIJAH, Ex. Dir. Correctional Assoc. of NY Gara LaMarche, NYU Wagner School of Public Service, Vivian Nixon, Exec. Dir. College and Community Fellowship, Heather Ann Thompson, Ass. Prof. of History, Temple Univ.

Event is free. Donations gratefully accepted.
RSVP by Oct 28; 212 691 1911 x 219, kjones@communityalternatives.org
Location: Puck Building 295 Lafayette Street, NYC



SATURDAY NOVEMBER 5, DOORS OPEN AT 6PM Citizens Against Recidivism 5th Annual Citizens’ Awards Event 


We never miss this event, and as usual we invite you to join our table for a reduced price. Send your check or money order for $45. to Prison Action Network, PO Box 6355, Albany NY 12206 by October 28, and you’ll be on the list at the door. 



The Citizens’ Award Event draws the public’s attention to people who did time for a crime and have shown that they were not only safe to release, but that their release has benefitted their communities, members of which voted for them to receive this award.

Keynote address by NYS Senator Bill Perkins. Light dining provided..
Advance Tickets  $55.  ($60 at the door).
For more information: http://www.citizensinc.org/FutureEvents2011.htm

Location:  TIAN, 679 Riverside Dr. (at W.145th St. in the Riverbank State Park)


WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 9, 6-8PM NYC Second Chance Committee
A Forum on Reentry: Where Are We? Where Should We Be?

Panelists: Glenn Martin, Fortune Society; Amir Amman, Student/Activist; Mary Arnold, Village Care of NY; Soffiyah Elijah, Correctional Association; Detrel Howell, DOCS Reentry Services; Dr. Divine Pryor, NU Leadership on Urban Solutions; Gabriel Torres-Rivera, Community Services Society

For more information, please call 877 626 4651 or 212 690 3070

Location: National Action Network Headquarters, 1006 W. 145th St. NYC
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

WHITE PLAINS event
Monday October 17, 6-8:30PM

“Bridging the Gap: Lessons Learned from a Reentry Collaboration with Victims and Victim Advocates” with Elizabeth Gaynes, Kathy Boudin, Marie Verzulli, Susan Herman (moderator) Free and open to the public.

Location: Pace Law School, Preston Hall, Tudor Room, 78 No. Broadway, White Plains, NY
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

MEETINGS

BUFFALO
MONDAY OCTOBER 31, 6:30-8:30PM Prisoners Are People Too, Inc.

We will hear about the Secure Youth Detention Center in Buffalo, NY; its history, its mission, its current services. With so many youth detention centers being closed around the state and with the December 2010 closing of Hopevale in nearby Hamburg, NY, people are interested in learning more about Buffalo’s youth detention center. Hopevale functioned for 155 years, first as a facility for troubled teen girls, then later as a coed residential home and school for troubled youth. Mr. David Rust, the Deputy Commissioner of Youth Services in Erie County and Ms. Nadia Moore, the Director of Buffalo’s Secure Youth Detention Center have been invited to share information about a facility that touches the lives of many juvenile offenders, ages 13-15, who have been charged with serious crimes.

Location: Pratt-Willert Community Center, 422 Pratt Street

The Circle of Supporters for Reformed Offenders and Friends of BaBa Eng are the sponsors of PRP2, Inc. programs.
For further information, contact Karima Amin: 716-834-8438 or karima@prisonersarepeopletoo.org.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

MANHATTAN meetings
WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 19, 1-3PM NY Reentry Roundtable
Guest Speakers: Representatives of the Human Resources Administration (HRA) will be making presentations on areas of interest to us, including new initiatives for the formerly incarcerated, child support enforcement, AIDS services, Food stamps and Medicaid. This will be an opportunity to ask questions and receive information from HRA representatives. Also, it will be opportunity for the agency to rectify misconceptions that surround some of HRA’s policies. Please RSVP to Gabriel Torres Rivera, J.D.

Location: Community Service Society of NY (CSS)
105 East 22nd St., corner Park Ave So. Conference Rm 4A
Take 6 or W/R to 23rd St.


THURSDAY OCTOBER 27, 5:30PM Education from the Inside Out Coalition (EIO) Meeting.
Our mission is to remove barriers to higher education funding facing students in prisons, both in NYS and nationwide. You can help us increase college access for incarcerated students TODAY! If you are interested in joining the Coalition or if you have any questions, please contact Lettisha Boyd at (646) 380 -7780.

Location: 475 Riverside Drive, Robing Room

Can't make it?   Call in! 800-662-6992, Access code: 107-9949

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SUPPORT GROUP MEETINGS:
ALBANY: EVERY MONDAY 7-8:30PM Prison Families of NY Support Group Meetings Alison 518-453-6659
EVERY TUESDAY at 6PM P-MOTIONS (Progressive Men Operating Towards Initiating Opportunities Now) Malik at 518-445-5487.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BROOKLYN
EVERY WEDNESDAY 5:30PM VOCAL Parolees Organizing Project For more info call 917 676-8041
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LONG ISLAND
WEDNESDAYS NOVEMBER 9 AND 23, 7:30PM Prison Families Anonymous meetings
Location: The Community Presbyterian Church 1843 Deer Park Avenue, Deer Park, NY.

WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 23 (see above) Prison Children Anonymous meets on the second Tuesday so children can share their experiences while the parent group, Prison Families Anonymous, meets at the same place and time but in another room and parents and guardians of children are encouraged to join that group while the children’s group is in session.

TUESDAY NOVEMBER 1 (& all first Tuesdays), 7:30PM at St Brigids Catholic Church, 75 Post Ave, Westbury, NY.

For information, please contact: Barbara: 631-943-0441 or Sue: 631-806-3903
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MANHATTAN
TUESDAY OCTOBER 18, 6-8PM Incarcerated Family Support Group
Sponsors: Coalition for Parole Restoration & Senator Bill Perkins
Do you have questions about visitation, tickets, appeals? Is your loved one going to the parole board and needs assistance preparing or do you just need someone to talk to about having a loved one in prison?

Invited Providers: Fortune Society, Osborne, Exodus, Strive
Please Rsvp 212 465-3241

Location: 163 West 125 Street Harlem State Building, 9th Floor (Senator Bill Perkins Conference room)

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Building Bridges is published by Prison Action Network as a way of communicating with our members.
If you would like to join, please email us or call 518 253 7533
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________