Tuesday, February 14, 2012

FEBRUARY 2012














From time to time during the month we post information that was too late for the last issue and will be out of date by the next. If you wish to go immediately to the February 2012 edition, please scroll down.


POSTED 2/29 BY COLUMBIA JUSTICE CAUCUS

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR THE
2012 REMOVING THE BARS CONFERENCE
AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
MARCH 23 AND 24TH
,
The "Removing the Bars: TAKE ACTION" conference:

For those affected by the criminal justice system, to help them advocate for positive change and ultimately create systemic sustainable transformation. We hope to provide a collaborative environment for service providers; community members; students and faculty to network and strategize around criminal justice related issues and enhance awareness and knowledge of systemic issues of oppression and their relationship to the criminal justice and prison systems.

All conference events are FREE and OPEN TO ALL.

Register Today. Space is Limited.

For conference updates, please visit the Criminal Justice Caucus blog

Questions? Email criminaljusticecaucus@gmail.com.

Having trouble with the registration link above? Try clicking the following link: to register.




POSTED 2/26 BY YOUTH GENERATION

Speak Out on March 2, at the Center for Community Alternatives located at 39 West 19th Street, 10th Floor, New York, New York.

4 BLOCKS FROM THE N,Q,R, 4,5,6,L,F,M TO 14TH STREET AND 1 TO 18TH STREET
GIFT BAGS! METROCARDS! PIZZA! Date: Friday 3/2
Time: 4:45PM - 6:30PM

Youth Generation, is a new youth group formed by youth and for youth. Youth Generation is holding monthly youth speak-outs to encourage youth to come together from across the city to discuss staying out of the criminal justice system, social awareness (racism, sexism, classism, etc.) and community organizing and leadership. Join youth as they discuss problems and propose solutions to create a better society. Adults will be admitted if accompanied by a youth (age 13-18). For more information please call 917.605.0625 or email youthgeneration@ccayouth.org.
See flyer.




POSTED 2/24/12 by Prisoners Are People Too!

Old Behind Bars
by
Karima Amin

Many on the outside have certain stereotypical pictures in their heads when they think of prisoners. Some don’t ever think of mothers in prison. Some never consider blind or deaf people in prison. Many never consider those who are growing old behind bars. As I cruise toward age 65 with Medicare and other health-related info filling my mailbox daily, I think of my contemporaries who are aging in a place that was never designed to be a senior living facility. Further, we rarely think of those terminally ill prisoners who may require hospice care. What happens to them?

While some state prison systems are liberal about granting compassionate release, most are not. Some prisons have outside organizations that come into the facility to provide hospice care while others carefully select and train prisoners to take care of those confined who are terminally ill. According to Human Right Watch, “…aging men and women are the most rapidly growing group in US prisons.” In a recent 104-page report, “Old Behind bars: The Aging Prison Population in the US,” the following information is stated:
·Nearly 10% of state prisoners are serving a life sentence. 11.2% have sentences longer than 20 years.
·The number of state and federal prisoners, age 65 or older, grew at 94 times the rate of the overall prison population between 2007 and 2010.
·Long sentences today mean that many current prisoners will not leave prison until they become extremely old, if at all.
·Many older prisoners remain incarcerated even though they are too old and infirm to threaten public safety if released.

While some states are moving forward to change the rules about mandatory minimum sentences and parole, the need for special medical care and hospice care for the elderly in prison is rapidly growing.

The next meeting of Prisoners Are People Too will screen the award-winning documentary film, “Serving Life,” which takes a look at prisoners caring for prisoners in the hospice unit of Angola State Prison (aka “The Farm”) in Louisiana, where the average sentence is more than 90 years. At Angola, the sentences are so long, 85% will never again live to see the outside world. Prisoners who volunteer in the hospice unit have said that this program provides the kind of bonding and empathy that leads to a clearer understanding of how fragile life is. It’s an opportunity that can be transformative. While hospice care is just one aspect of growing old in prison, prisons must also be prepared to provide for the medical needs of the elderly who frequently require special safety precautions, emotional feedback, special nutrition, or whatever may be needed to deal with diabetes, hepatitis C, or cancer …and the list goes on.

The next meeting of Prisoners Are People Too will be on Monday, February 27 at the Pratt-Willert Community Center, 422 Pratt Street in Buffalo, at 6:30-8:30pm. The Circle of Supporters for Reformed Offenders and Friends of BaBa Eng are the sponsors of this program. For further information, contact Karima Amin, 716-834-8438 or karima@prisonersare peopletoo.org.



BUILDING BRIDGES FEBRUARY 15 2012


A New World is Possible!

Dear Reader, Please be well, keep the faith, share the news, and for everyone’s sake, get involved! The Editor


HEADLINES:

1. Pepsi Beverages Company has agreed to a $3.1 million settlement following federal charges that Pepsi committed racial discrimination in its hiring practices, specifically by eliminating approximately 300 African American applicants based on arrest records (but not necessarily convictions).

2. Threat to close Auburn Prison’s Hospitality Center alarms families who depend on this service to provide shelter while they wait from the time the bus drops them off until the beginning of visiting hours.

3. Today’s “Incarcerated Man” is vastly different from the representative specimen of yesteryear. For the first time in “incarcerated man’s” history there are more notable success stories than failures, as evidenced by a dwindling prison population and the success of the many women and men in leadership positions in re-entry programs throughout the state.

4. Two Job Opportunities: 1) Full time Development Associate at the Correctional Association. 2) Combine your desire to sharpen your skills and your commitment to fair criminal justice policies by training to become a media volunteer with the NYS Parole Reform Campaign. Free training.

5. Standardize Marijuana Offenses: We need a permanent, statewide solution like the bipartisan version proposed by Assemblyman Jeffries and Senator Grisanti. Please support A.7620 (Jeffries)/S.5187 (Grisanti): legislation that would end the racially biased, costly, and unconstitutional marijuana arrests throughout New York State.

6. How is the merger of DOCCS going to be implemented, and when? Who is overseeing the process? In this vast system with all its tensions and conflicts - between agencies, between management and unions -who is monitoring this monolithic entity? Building Bridges attempted to find out by attending, and reading testimony from, the Public Hearing on the Merger of DOCS and the Division of Parole into the new Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Thursday, November 10, 2011 and a hearing on the Public Protection portion of the 2012-13 Executive Budget, held by the State Legislature's fiscal committees on January 30, 2012.

7. Family member B. Russo took matters into her own hands and posted a petition in support of Senator Montgomery’s Merit Time Bill, S338. If you want to make your voice heard, please sign the petition.

8. Last chance to decide to attend the Caucus weekend workshops. The NYS Parole Reform Campaign of the Coalition for Fair Criminal Justice Policies has a room that holds 500. Think of the impression it would make if it was filled! But if you can’t get there, you can help to get your legislators to support the SAFE Parole Act. People are suffering in prison waiting for us to win this struggle. It won’t be easy, but it can be done if we ALL get involved!

9. Mass Incarceration and the NYS Prisoner Justice Movement: “Dear Prisoner Justice Network, I have been in prison for 27 years. My last parole hearing lasted 4 minutes.“ Mass incarceration is a false solution that gets in the way of real solutions. It does not interrupt violence -- it feeds the cycle of violence.

10. Parole News: No stats this month, check back in March. Updates on Thwaites decision, and Graziano’s. In a new decision, Judge Lawrence H. Ecker hands down an almost identical ruling in the case of Newlly Velazquez as he did for Douglas Thwaites’s, one month previously. He again quotes Professor Phillip Genty’s interpretation of the governor’s revisions to the Parole Statute, including: “[T]he most important change is the replacement of static, past focused "guidelines" with more dynamic present and future-focused risk assessment "procedures" to guide the Parole Board”.

11. Stop and Frisk policies are the scourge of a Black person’s life, particularly for males, and particularly for young males. But as this story reveals, even grey haired 70 year old Black men are not immune to being stopped and frisked.

12. Veterans in Prison, a report by Karima Amin in Buffalo, where the first Veteran’s Treatment Court in the nation was created by Judge Robert T. Russell, Jr.


13. Over 37,000 New Yorkers are denied their constitutional right to vote because they are on parole, even though they are living and working in their communities. Join the effort to change this!

[For copies of articles referred to in this issue, please send an email with request stating # and title of article and date.]




1. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION: PEPSI REACHES $3.1 MILLION SETTELMENT WITH EEOC DUE TO RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
Posted by Sharon: Zaleski on  JANUARY 18, 2012 at www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newroom/.

Well, it’s happened and it’s a big one. Pepsi Beverages Company has agreed to a $3.1 million settlement with the Equal Opportunity Commission (EEOC). This comes following federal charges that Pepsi committed racial discrimination in its hiring practices. At issue was the use of criminal background checks to screen job applicants, but more specifically, the elimination of approximately 300 African American applicants based on arrest records (but not necessarily convictions). After the findings surfaced back in 2006, Pepsi was cooperative, and to avoid a lawsuit worked with the EEOC to reach the agreement.

The EEOC says using arrest and conviction records to deny employment can be illegal if it’s irrelevant for the job. Along with the financial settlement, the 300 or so applicants that were denied employment will receive suitable job offers and share in the majority of the $3.1 million. In addition, Pepsi will provide the EEOC with regular reports on its hiring practices and conduct anti-discrimination to hiring personnel. Pepsi has also modified their hiring practices and process to check applicant backgrounds.

Based on what’s happened at Pepsi, it’s probably a very good idea for businesses to revisit or examine their hiring and background check policies to be in compliance with the EEOC and avoid against problems in the future.



2. HOSPITALITY CENTERS
In a letter sent to Prison Action Network from a man incarcerated at Auburn Correctional Facility we learned that the Hospitality Center there was scheduled to close for good on Dec. 31, 2011. We have since learned from a visitor that it is still open, which is a relief to know.

The Hospitality Center provides a very important service for those family members visiting loved ones at the facility. After what is in most cases a long ride, it offers a place for them to step in and rest awhile, provides refuge from the elements and a place to refresh themselves. The vans and buses traveling from the NYC area typically arrive at around 7 am. This cannot be avoided because these same transportation services also go to Five Points and Cayuga Correctional Facilities. Even though they arrive at Auburn at 7 am, visiting hours do not commence until 9am. In the case of a Family Reunification Program visit, the wait is even longer. Visitors are not brought over to the FRP units until 1 pm. There are also frequent visitors traveling from out of state. If the Hospitality Center had closed, these visitors would be left out in the elements for this time. There is no indoor waiting area, and the guards do not allow people to wait inside. Among the visitors are the elderly, children, or others who are just plain unable to withstand this. Family visits are known to reduce recidivism rates of those who maintain close family ties.



3. “INCARCERATED MAN” JOINS THE RANKS OF SUCH HISTORICAL STALWARTS AS "PEKING MAN, CAVE MAN, RENAISSANCE MAN" AND OTHERS.j

In the January 15 edition of Building Bridges, I noted that my daughter Ariel was mentioned as a panel member on an upcoming Criminal Justice Series workshop presented by the the Coalition for Fair Criminal Justice Policies, scheduled for Feb 18 in Albany. [see Article 8 for details]

I was surprised to note a reference to me as “incarcerated man”. I enjoyed a laugh as I realized that I had suddenly joined the ranks of such historical stalwarts as “Peking Man, Cave Man, Renaissance Man” and others. These unnamed representatives of the rest of us serve as placeholders in time. I wonder if Ariel appreciates the significance of being living offspring of such a legendary figure - “Incarcerated Man.”

“Incarcerated Man” provides a useful link in this time and place and within the criminal justice issues of our day. Particularly issues regarding community reintegration and parole preparedness. These issues hold a greater significance today than at any other time in the last fifty years. Incarcerated Man is undergoing a transformation; he has reached the nadir of his misfortunes and a new paradigm is being created out of the hard work and sacrifice of the formerly incarcerated. Today’s “incarcerated man” is vastly different from the representative specimen of yesteryear. For the first time in “incarcerated man’s” history there are more notable success stories than failures, as evidenced by a dwindling prison population and the success of the many women and men in leadership positions in re-entry programs throughout the state.

Incarcerated Man remains tethered to the past however, through institutional indifference, fear, and misconceptions about community supervision. (This is incarceration by other means). New ideas about community reintegration, and efforts at rehabilitation while on the inside, represent progress, evolution, and hope for a better day to come for thousands. More is needed to heal and to create trust. For each step forward we must be prepared occasionally to take a step back.

The recent changes in legislation regarding parole and the merger of Corrections with Parole are positive steps toward a more realistic approach to public safety. However, as recent parole decisions have shown, there are still sharp differences between the legislative, judicial and executive branches of government regarding implementation. The courts rule one way, and the parole board pushes back in the form of negative parole decisions which seemingly fly in the face of both legislative intent and legal decisions. Perhaps the parole board sees such judicial decisions as an encroachment upon the parole board’s authority and relevance.

Enter the SAFE Parole Act, which offers a rational approach to public safety, community reintegration and parole readiness. The SAFE Parole Act offers transparency of process and accountability for both parole candidates and parole boards. It is cost effective, and focused on tangible results with respect to rehabilitation; the potential benefits outweigh any negatives.

The prospects for the future of Incarcerated Man and society are for the moment, potentially great. But there remains much work to be done. Change is almost always a slow process.

Ismail Igartua, 88A5099, Fishkill Correctional Facility

Ismail is a 50-year old New Yorker from Spanish Harlem. He has been incarcerated for 25 years. He earned a BA from Skidmore College in 1995 and a Masters in Professional Studies -MPS - from the NY Theological Seminary. His next parole board appearance is November 2013. He is appealing his most recent parole denial.




4. TWO JOB OPPORTUNITIES

1) The Correctional Association currently has a position open for a full-time Development Associate. 
Responsibilities will include: managing the departmental database; planning and executing special events; developing fundraising materials in collaboration with program and communications staff; coordinating donor mailings; and managing the direct mail program. Persons interested in applying for this position should submit a résumé, cover letter and one writing sample by email only to Marci McLendon at devjobs@correctionalassociation.org. Résumés without cover letters and a writing sample will not be accepted.  No phone calls please. 

2) NYS Parole Reform Campaign offers free training in media communications technology and methodology for a volunteer job with the Campaign. Learn to use communication platforms; build new skills in technology and culture; audience engagement online and on-site; and strategies for campaigns. We are looking for a highly motivated volunteer to help with media outreach, messaging and video interviewing, etc. Personal enthusiasm for the SAFE Parole Act is essential. You must be able to travel to Detroit in June for training (travel, registration and accommodations will be paid for). We are asking for at least a 6 month commitment of 3 volunteer hours a week working to pass the SAFE Parole Act. For more information or to apply, please write us at: parolereform@gmail.com. Deadline for applications is March 13.




5. STANDARDIZE MARIJUANA OFFENSES IN THE NY PENAL LAW

Please support A.7620 (Jeffries)/S.5187 (Grisanti): legislation that would standardize marijuana offenses in the Penal Law. Visit this website and send a letter to your legislators.

Excerpts from the letter:

...This legislation was re-introduced this year by Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries and Senator Mark Grisanti in order to help end the racially biased, costly, and unconstitutional marijuana arrests throughout New York State.
....
...These arrests are racially biased and target young people. Almost 70% of those arrested are 16-29 years old. Over 84% of all those arrested are Black and Latino -- even though government studies of high school seniors show whites use marijuana at higher rates. These arrests create a criminal record that can stay with someone for the rest of their life, severely limiting their opportunities.

....NYPD Police Commissioner Ray Kelly recently issued an internal directive to officers, reminding them of the 1977 law. The order also directed officers not to charge people for a criminal misdemeanor when in fact the individual only committed a non-criminal violation. This operations order is a tacit admission that for years officers have not followed the law, leading to the civil rights violations of hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers. ...We need a permanent, statewide solution like the bipartisan version proposed by Assemblyman Jeffries and Senator Grisanti.



6. HOW IS THE MERGER OF DOCCS, AND THE NEW INDEPENDENCE OF THE PAROLE BOARD WORKING OUT? BUILDING BRIDGES TRIED TO FIND OUT.

[Compiled from written testimony and a transcript of the Public Hearing on the Merger of DOCS and the Division of Parole into the new Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Thursday, November 10, 2011, and the hearing on the Public Protection portion of the 2012-13 Executive Budget, held by the State Legislature's fiscal committees on January 30, 2012.]

Assembly Member Jeffrion Aubry, Chair, Committee on Correction asked the questions and DOCCS Commissioner Brian Fischer and Parole Board Chair Andrea Evans gave the answers. [B.B. combined all three into this report, with exceptions where it seemed particularly important to know the exact source. ]

BACKGROUND FACTS:
The merger is expected to save $6.5 million in 2011-2012, and $8 M. a year after that.
DOCCS is now responsible for supervising a population of 95,000 people between those in prison and those on parole; 56,000 in prison, 38,000 on community supervision. The new agency has close to 30,000 employees, 29,000 inside prison, and 1,700 in community supervision. The Parole Board has 72 employees.
Their combined mission statement: To improve public safety by providing a continuity of appropriate treatment services in safe and secure facilities where offenders’ needs are addressed and they are prepared for release, followed by supportive services under community supervision to facilitate a successful completion of their sentence.

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE NEW COMBINED DEPARTMENT:
A new Deputy Commissioner and an Assistant Commissioner for Community Supervision are part of the new agency’s Executive Team. In addition, DOCCS established 7 Regional Directors within Community Supervision, seen as equal to the 9 Supervising HUB Superintendents within Corrections. The Parole Board will function as a separate entity within DOCCS, retaining independence in its decisions. The Commissioner of DOCCS is mandated to provide the Board and its staff with the information and resources necessary to perform their role.

TAP (TRANSITIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN) AND COMPAS (A RISK AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT):
The goal is to better plan, provide and document treatment from day one through release and community supervision. These tools will provide a better understanding of what the treatment needs of our inmates are, and what programs have the greatest likelihood of reducing recidivism for those released. DOCCS is continuing to assess prison programs to determine which have the greatest impact on providing needed skills to inmates. Academic education and enhanced computer literacy are of primary importance. With facility parole staff working in unison with correction counselors, and field parole staff picking up on work done inside, information sharing has become easier and more informative for everyone. The goal is clear; meet the needs of the offender upon his/her arrival in the system, as he/she gets ready to be released, and while in the community. [Fischer]


TAP will be started upon an inmate’s first facility assignment, updated by both counselors and parole staff throughout his/her incarceration, used to provide the Parole Board or Community Supervision staff with identified needs and plans for providing a fuller assessment of each offender’s strengths, weakness and accomplishments and documenting them over time.

COMPAS: The use of COMPAS by both facility and field parole staff will help them assess risk factors, make better caseload assignments and maximize the use of graduated sanctions when called for. [Fischer] In Sept of 2011 all Board members received training in the use of the risk and needs instrument known as COMPAS. Come January 2012, everyone coming out will have a COMPAS done. [Fischer]


COMPAS will be used to assign caseloads, based on research and reality. High risk will require more intensive supervision: 1 officer per 25 people. Medium high supervision: 1-40. Regular supervision 1-80. Low risk at 1-160. A 1-10 will remain for SIST (Strict and Intensive Supervision) which is mostly given to sex offenders and can also be given to some violent offenders; 1-25 for regular sex offenders and those who are designated as SMI (Seriously Mentally Ill). In Fiscal Year 2012/13 we will begin to use a new risk instrument on all sex offenders under community supervision designed to highlight potentially negative changes in thinking and behavior. Such a tool will enable the Parole Officer to more quickly respond to changes in order to modify the offender’s supervision needs. [Fischer]


Together the Board of Parole and DOCCS have been developing the Transitional Accountability Plan (TAP) to be used by DOCCS staff to determine institutional programming and community supervision plans, and to measure the rehabilitation of persons appearing before the Board as well as their likelihood of success in the community when released. At the time of reception, a comparable risk/needs assessment tool, followed by a data-based treatment initiative for in-prison programming will be applied.


In July 2011 each Board member, and 700 counselors and parole officers received training in the use of the TAP instrument. Both facility staff and correction counselors have also trained in TAP and in COMPAS. The TAP is begun by a C.O. and a Correction Counselor, and is input by a Parole Officer. COMPAS is administered by Parole but can also be done by a Correction Counselor. 


The use of these instruments (TAP and COMPAS) was to begin by Nov. 19, 2011 as a pilot project in 3 DOCCS facilities for the purposes of determining appropriate conditions of supervision. In the meantime, whenever and wherever a TAP has been prepared, the Parole Board has been instructed to use it. 


When the pilot phase is over, TAPs will be used for all parole applicants to assess the appropriateness of their release to community supervision. Because the TAP indicates an inmate’s overall effort toward effecting his or her rehabilitation while incarcerated and draws upon information closely associated with the risk of reoffending and identifies what they need to successfully reintegrate, the Board’s written procedures will call for the use and careful consideration of these documents. In the interim the Board will use the TAP when and where it has been prepared. [Evans] TAP was ready to go but because it was not as quantitative as thought necessary, it was revamped, which set back the implementation date to July 1, 2011. By October 2011 it was expected to be in full use.


TAP was designed initially to be a motivational kind of open-ended discussion with the offender. What does this person need? What does this person want to do? What does this person need to be rehabilitated? Did this person succeed in his/her rehabilitation? 


TAP will do away with the quarterly report. It will show the Parole Board member the entire progress from beginning to end. Added documentation and quantitative data on things like housing, education, employment, substance abuse, family, financial needs, leisure time activity, medical and mental health will be part of it. It designed to create a picture “based on what the offender talks about, not what we believe his needs are. “ [Fisher]

DIVISION OF LABOR:
Commissioner of DOCCS is to provide the Parole Board and its staff with the information and resources necessary to perform their independent decision making role. Board members will receive reports that have been prepared by former Div. of Parole staff (newly titled Rehabilitation Coordinators) , including information of criminal history, crime of conviction, institutional adjustment, programming and release plans. [Evans] Facility Parole Officers and Correction Counselors are now under the Deputy Superintendent for Programs..

APPEALS OF PAROLE RELEASE DENIALS:
The Board of Parole has created a Bureaus of Adjudication, comprised of administrative law judges and preliminary hearing officers under the immediate supervision of the Board’s chief administrative law judge, creating a closer working relationship between the Board and those who adjudicate alleged violations in the area of community supervision.

Parole Council’s office now serves as exclusive legal advisors to the board, and continues in its efforts to process appeals in a timely and most independent manner. [Evans]

CERTIFICATES OF RELIEF FROM DISABILITIES:
Granted by DOCCS; drafted in the facility, signed by the superintendent and given to the person when they leave. [Fischer and Evans]

MEDICAL PAROLE:
Both DOCCS and the Parole Board will work together to grant medical parole and will be using a new Parole Board Criminal History Report being developed with the Division of Criminal Justice for a more comprehensive review of an offender’s criminal and previous Parole supervision. In our joint opinion, there are some cases where we think a person should be on medical parole, but the problem is, where do you place them? Who will sign for Medicaid? And when a person is no longer competent to make health care decisions who becomes their guardian? There’s a review even before the Board gets the case. There’s a medical review. “I personally review the case,” said Fischer. Then it goes to the Parole Board.

REVIEWING INMATE FILES PRIOR TO A PAROLE HEARING:
It’s taking about 30 minutes to review a file. The Board gets access to them the day before. Some commissioners look at them the day before and some do it in the morning, in either case they have adequate time for review. One of the benefits of videoconferencing is that it gives them more time to sit with the files. They see an average of 23 cases in a given day. [Evans]
The TAP and the COMPAS should allow all of us, particularly the Parole Board to get a better, quicker review of the case. [Fisher}

WRITTEN PROCEDURES AS MANDATED BY LAW:
The Parole Board is mandated to develop written procedures to be used when making release decisions. Because the TAP instrument indicates an inmate’s overall effort toward effecting his or her rehabilitation while incarcerated and draws upon information closely associated with their risk of reoffending (COMPAS) and what they need in order to become successful, the Board’s written procedures will call for the use and careful consideration of these documents. [Evans}

QUESTIONABLE STATEMENT:
“The Parole Board, when they’re sitting in panels, continue to be allowed to make independent decisions ...we need to consider the type of inmates that we have, and as a result of sentencing restructuring and the focus on reentry, thousands and thousands of inmates have been released. We were left with violent felony offenders.” [Evans]
(Editor’s note: We hope Commissioner Evans is referring to the fact that violent felony offenders are the group least likely to recommit a crime. They are among the most educated, remorseful and rehabilitated of NYS prisoners. Therefore it makes sense to be releasing more of them. Do parole commissioners know that of the 368 people convicted of murder who were granted parole in NY between 1999 and 2003, only 6, or less than 2% returned to prison within 3 years for a new felony conviction, and none of these for a violent offense, according to a 2011 NYS Parole Board study?)



7. MERIT TIME BILL PETITIOn

The Merit Time Bill S338/A154, sponsored by Senator Velmanette Montgomery and co-sponsored by Senator Dilan is sitting in the Senate Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections Committee and in the Assembly’s Correction Committee, as is the SAFE Parole Act.

A family member has posted a petition online for those who would like to indicate their support for passage of this bill which extends Merit Time to people convicted of violent felony crimes:
Click here to sign. 

Questions? Contact B Russo brusso86@yahoo.com




8. NYS PAROLE REFORM CAMPAIGN UPDATES

COME TO CAUCUS WEEKEND:
It’s not too late to plan a trip to Albany on Sat. Feb. 18 to attend the Coalition for Fair Criminal Justice’s workshop at the BLACK, PUERTO RICAN, HISPANIC & ASIAN LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS WEEKEND. We need to convince these legislators it would be good for everyone if they supported the SAFE Parole Act. We have a room that holds 500. Think of the impression we would make if it was filled! 10:15 am, Hearing Room B. Ask for directions at the Capitol’s Security check-in. There may still be room on the bus, or put yourself on a waiting list, call Larry White: 646-796-4203

If it’s impossible for you to attend, please call your legislators to tell them you want them to attend the workshop. The panel will offer a critique of current parole policies that disproportionately affect communities of color, and their suggestions for reforms. The actual title is CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERIES, Parole Release Decisions in the Era of Reintegration. 10:15am, Hearing Room B. Topic/Issue(s) to be discussed:   Deficits in current Parole Board release policies and a proposal to correct them.

Moderator: Glenn E. Martin, The Fortune Society, Vice President of Development and Public Affairs

Panelists:
Incarcerated members of the Second Look Org. at Sullivan Correctional Facility (on video, or through a written statement)
Julia Long, The Coalition for Fair Criminal Justice Policies’ Policy Committee, former legislative aide
Larry White,  Prison Action Network,  Ending The New Jim Crow,  Fortune Society Community Organizer
Jeffrion Aubry, Assembly sponsor of the Safe and Fair Evaluations (S.A.F.E.) Parole Act, A7939/S5374 
Christina Hernandez, NYS Parole Board Commissioner 
Ariel Igartua,  High School student whose father was recently denied parole release 


WE'VE IMPROVED OUR WEBSITE: WWW.PAROLEREFORM.ORG
If you haven’t visited us yet, or it’s been a while, please stop in and check it out! Click on Take Action and in a few minutes you will have sent a (or another) letter to your state legislators and the governor. You can always delete the form letter that’s there and write your own. It will display their names and phone numbers so you can follow up with them later.

Some background to help you advocate for the SAFE Parole Act:

What’s REALLY important is for New Yorkers to convince the legislators in whose district they live that it’s important to you that they support The SAFE Parole Act, S5374/A7939, because when it comes time for a vote every possible one of them needs to vote for it.

There are a lot of legislators: 61 State Senators (there’s 1 vacancy) and 146 State Assembly Members (there’s 4 vacancies). That’s 207 people, and at least 104 have to vote yes for the bill to pass. (And then the governor has to approve it...)

But that’s the second step.

The first step:
It has to be passed by a majority of the Committee where it now sits. If they pass it, it goes before the full body for a vote. That’s when we need those 31 votes in the Senate, and 74 in the Assembly. If the Committee vetoes it, we have to wait until 2013 to start all over again -finding sponsors who will reintroduce it.

The SAFE Parole Act is now in the Assembly’s Corrections Committee and the Senate’s Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections Committee.There are 14 members on the Corrections Committee and 10 on the Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections Committee. We need a majority in each of those committees to vote for it.

To see the members of the Corrections Committee: www.assembly.state.ny.us. To see members of the Senate Committee: www.nysenate.gov. If one of them represents you, you are VERY important to this campaign. Our bill depends on your ability to persuade that person to support the bill, Senate Bill S5374 same as Assembly Bill A7939.

Explore www.parolereform.org. It has all the tools you’ll need. You can always email us or call 518 253 7533.



9. THE NYS PRISONER JUSTICE NETWORK COLUMN

This month’s New York State Prisoner Justice Network column is an article by NYSPJN that appeared in the February issue of the Syracuse Peace News. It was written to promote a panel and community discussion presented by members of the Prisoner Justice Network, hosted by the Syracuse Peace Council and the Center for Community Alternatives. The program was entitled, “What’s Wrong with New York’s Prison System, and What Can We Do About It?” The extraordinary turnout of over 70 people was an indication of the growing public concern about mass incarceration, and a sign that Syracuse can play a strong role in building a statewide voice for prisoner justice.


MASS INCARCERATION AND THE PRISONER JUSTICE MOVEMENT IN NEW YORK STATE

Dear Prisoner Justice Network, I have been in prison for 27 years. My last parole hearing lasted 4 minutes.

Dear New York State Prisoner Justice: We, New York’s incarcerated prisoners have gone 70 years without a pay wage increase. Our pay is about $4 a week...

Dear Brothers and Sisters, My reason for writing this letter is what the black and latino prisoners are going through which is a series of staff assaults, sexual harassment and racialism. It would be appreciated if this is published. Maybe someone would do something to help us.

Dear Prisoner Justice, I was convicted for a burglary. No weapon was involved, nobody was home, and nobody was hurt. I was sentenced to 12 years to life.

Dear Friend: Injustice can make a person insane, when a person feels that nobody is listening to them and they have no court for the redress of their grievance.

These are a tiny sampling of the dozens of letters received by the New York State Prisoner Justice Network. Who are these incarcerated women and men, why are they in prison, what happens to them while they are there, and what happens when (and if) they get out?

New York’s 56,000 prisoners: 75% are people of color; 96% are male; the great majority have never had a trial (they were convicted on plea bargains); around 2/3 are poor; about half are from New York City. Some are innocent, some have committed serious crimes, and many are somewhere in between. Very few have done anything as terrible as what is being done to them in the name of justice.

Mass incarceration clearly does not do what its backers say it does – it does not keep our communities safe. It does not protect our kids from gun violence or police abuse. It does not protect women from sexual assault. It does not heal mental illness; it does not create paths to dignity and economic sustenance. It does not interrupt violence -- it feeds the cycle of violence. Mass incarceration is a false solution that gets in the way of real solutions.

Instead, the real agenda behind mass incarceration is repression, racism, power, and greed. The prison boom of the 1970s and 1980s followed the mass social justice movements boom of the 60s and 70s.

Today, careers are made out of the bloated prison system: prosecutors, police, right-wing media, prison guards, politicians, pundits, legislators, governors.

And yet this is a moment of possibility for prisoner justice. The U.S. prison system is being challenged from many sides. The anti-death penalty and innocence movements have raised fundamental questions; Michelle Alexander’s book The New Jim Crow provided definitive evidence that mass incarceration is the leading form of racial oppression in our time; major prison strikes in California and Georgia in 2011 called attention to intolerable conditions.

In New York, modest reforms have been won in alternative and reduced sentencing for drug offenders, limiting solitary confinement for people with diagnosed mental illness, and counting prisoners in their home communities rather than their place of confinement for legislative districting. There is a strong campaign challenging the parole policies that can keep people behind bars forever with no way out.

The prisoner justice movement has a large and bold vision: a society that directs resources at the causes of social problems, including economic injustice, racism, and inequality; that implements community-based accountability; that treats violence, addiction, and mental illness as serious public health issues; that addresses the crimes and violence of the most powerful members of society as well as the least powerful. Re-thinking mass incarceration challenges us to work toward a prisonless society that would liberate not only prisoners, but all of us.




10. PAROLE NEWS

Note: It’s February and as we warned you in January, there are no parole release statistics published in this issue. They are not released to the parole website until too close to our deadline to complete the work involved. December was an exception. In March we will publish January’s releases.

Douglas Thwaites reports that the Asst Attorney General is appealing Judge Ecker’s ruling in which the Judge ordered the Parole Board to hold a new hearing for Mr. Thwaites with a different panel within 30 days of the decision dated 12/21/11. Thwaites is challenging the appeal. He thanks all who have written in support and asks us to keep faith alive. His next parole hearing is scheduled for March 2012.

On January 26, 2012, Judge Lawrence H. Ecker issued a similar ruling in the matter of Newlley Velasquez v. NYS Board of Parole, citing the same arguments, drawing the same conclusions, and ordering the Board to take the same actions as in Douglas Thwaites’s case.


Graziano does not give up!

It is not the end of the road yet.  Lawyers are waiting for a date to argue their federal case to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.  They also plan to request leave to appeal the state case to the New York Court of Appeals. 




11. JAZZ HAYDEN AND THE FIGHT AGAINST STOP-AND-FRISK
Graham Rayman, Wednesday, Feb 8 2012 the Village Voice



Jazz Hayden might be the most unlikely character in the long-running controversy over the NYPD's stop-and-frisk campaign, which has affected more than 4 million New Yorkers since 2004.

Jazz Hayden alleges police illegally searched his car in December 2011. After the search yielded a penknife, Hayden was arrested on a felony weapons charge.

 Hayden, a longtime Harlem community activist, films stop-and-frisks and then posts the videos to the Internet as part of his Copwatch program. Hayden plans to sue the NYPD for improper stop and arrest after he was pulled over by police in December.



The 70-year-old Hayden, whose given name is Joseph, is a longtime community activist in Harlem. In a past life, he was a street hustler who served three years in prison in the late 1950s for drugs, was falsely accused in the late 1960s in a high-profile shooting of two police officers in the politically turbulent year of 1968, was convicted of money laundering in the 1970s, and served 13 years in prison from 1986 to 2000 for manslaughter after a traffic dispute turned fatal

“We are trying to build a movement to end these racist/fascist practices and we need your ‘intelligent and informed’ support”’ says Jazz. 

[Read more of the Village Voice newspaper article.]



12. 140,000 VETERANS IN PRISON, by Karima Amin



This was the title of a 2009 article published by Change.Org on Veterans’ Day. I read the article with interest, thinking of my father, a World War II veteran, who had died earlier that year at the age of 93. He was very proud of having served this country and his red, white ‘n’ blue flag was always on view on the front porch on Memorial Day and Veterans’ Day. My father was also a staunch proponent of Prisoners Are People Too. I read that article and wondered about what he might have had to say about so many veterans incarcerated in our state and federal prisons. That number above, “140,000,” does not include the tens of thousands more in our county jails. It is often said that veterans deserve our respect and support, but what about the veterans who find themselves behind bars?



In 2009, the Drug Policy Alliance issued a report entitled, “Healing a Broken System: Veterans Battling Addiction and Incarceration.” This report details the results of a study that was done to examine the drug addiction and mental health issues, faced by veterans, which could contribute to that person’s violations of the law. While substance abuse and mental illness among U.S. veterans are major problems, they tend to lead to other issues that may be inadequately addressed. Among these issues are:  PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder), homelessness, poor overall health, death by overdose, and susceptibility to suicide. The report also states that incarcerated veterans face “…a wide range of punitive policies that limit their access to social services necessary for their reentry to civilian life.”


Buffalo activists are involved in learning more about 
Buffalo’s Veterans’ Treatment Court, which is the first such court in the nation, created by the Honorable Judge Robert T. Russell, Jr. in 2008. In January PRP2! watched “When I Came Home,” a film about homeless veterans in America who face a failing system while struggling to survive.

The Circle of Supporters for Reformed Offenders and Friends of BaBa Eng are the sponsors of this program. 
For further information, contact Karima Amin, 716-834-8438 or email her.



13. VOTING RIGHTS

Over 37,000 New Yorkers are denied their constitutional right to vote because they are on parole, even though they are living and working in their communities. Nationwide, more than 5 million people are barred from voting because of incarceration or a past criminal record. VOCAL-NY invites you to help restore parolee voting rights today by:



1.    Adding your organization onto a statewide sign-on letter calling on the Governor to use his Executive Order power to restore parolees’ right to vote. To do so contact Jeremy Saunders at jeremy@vocal-ny.org.



2.    Call Assembly Member Jeffries (518-455-5325) and Assembly Member Camara ( 518-455-5262) and leave a message thanking them for their leadership in addressing the issue of voting rights for people on parole. Ask them to share your message with all the members in the Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic and Asian Caucus.



Building Bridges is Prison Action Network’s way to stay in contact with its members. 
Email or call 518 253 7533 if you want to become a member.

Thursday, January 12, 2012

JANUARY 2012














During the month we post time sensitive news and announcements. If you wish to skip them, please scroll down.

POSTED FEBRUARY 10 BY PRISONERS ARE PEOPLE TOO!

COMMUNITY FORUM: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 5:30-7:30 PM

PROCEDURES? PROTOCOLS? PROBLEMS? PROMISES?

WHAT’S GOING ON AT
THE ERIE COUNTY HOLDING CENTER?

Sponsored by
PRISONERS ARE PEOPLE TOO, INC, ERIE COUNTY PRISONERS RIGHTS COALITION, and WE ARE WOMEN WARRIORS

FRANK E. MERRIWEATHER, JR. LIBRARY
1324 JEFFERSON AVE. @ EAST UTICA STREET

The Community has questions! The Panelists should have answers!

PANELISTS WILL BE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ERIE COUNTY JAIL MANAGEMENT AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT

WANT MORE INFO? CALL 716-834-8438 OR EMAIL karima@prisonersarepeopletoo.org



BUILDING BRIDGES JANUARY 15 2012

PEACE AND JUSTICE IN 2012!
Dear Reader,

We’re starting the new year with some changes. Perhaps the most drastic change is that we’re no longer publishing a calendar of events. There are many other places where the information is available, foremost among them the monthly Reentry Net/NY calendar, which provides New York State advocates with information about upcoming conferences, trainings, meetings, and other events related to prison and jail reentry and the consequences of criminal proceedings. Contact information for each event is provided on the calendar. To add an event to the calendar, visit the site and click "add event."

We’ve enjoyed providing the calendar to readers, particularly those without computer access, so they could participate and/or be aware of how much attention is being paid to criminal justice issues. But every month we find it harder and harder to fit everything into 10 pages, and we think it’s important to share information which is not available anywhere else under one cover. If however, there is an outcry against this decision we will consider other options, one of which is to include our calendar in those electronic editions (email and website) where we have unlimited space. Please let us know if you have strong feelings about this change. In fact we’d love to hear from you anyway. Building Bridges exists to share important news with, for and by our members, so let us know if we can serve you better.

Please be well, keep the faith, share the news, and for everyone’s sake, get involved!
The Editor

SUMMARIES

1. CRIME AFTER CRIME, a powerful documentary film about a woman who was sentenced to 25-Life for her role in the death of her abusive boyfriend. She and a pair of pro-bono rookie attorneys take viewers with them as they encounter the corrupt and politically driven twists and turns of the criminal justice system. Free showing includes discussion with one of the lawyers and the legislators who are sponsoring the Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act, A7874/S5436.


2. LEGISLATION - Update on the status of last year’s major CJ bills. Most are back in committee, starting over, but some have made significant movement.


3. NYS PAROLE REFORM CAMPAIGN invites readers to attend their workshop at the Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic & Asian Legislative Caucus Weekend, ON FEB. 18 IN ALBANY. It’s part of a series of social, civil and criminal justice workshops.


4. NYS PRISONER JUSTICE believes these are the worst of times and the best of times. The best is the many movements and campaigns that are working to solve social problems by providing people with positive opportunities to realize their potential and contribute to their communities. The worst is that after hundreds of years racism is still thriving, now through the mass incarceration of predominately poor and Black people. We haven’t won the war, but we haven’t lost it either.


5. PAROLE NEWS takes 5 pages to report this month! November and December statistics; a year-end summary; memo to the Parole Board from Chairwoman Evans; Thwaites and Graziano court decisions.

6. PRISONERS OF THE CENSUS - a victory! Prisoners will be counted in their home districts for redistricting purposes. Kudos to the Prison Policy Institute which was instrumental in exposing the inequities of counting prisoners where they are incarcerated.

[For copies of articles referred to in this issue, please send an email with your request stating # and title of article and date.]



1. CRIME AFTER CRIME, A POWERFUL FILM ABOUT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND PRISON

I shared my excitement about this film in article #4 of the November Building Bridges after I viewed it at a screening in Albany by Prisoners Legal Services to announce their new Pro Bono project. Now’s your chance to see it (bring tissues).

Directed by the talented Yoav Potash, Crime After Crime chronicles the experience of Deborah Peagler, a California woman charged with murder in the 1st degree, for her role in the death of her abusive boyfriend. After being threatened with the death penalty, Debbie was sentenced to 25 years to life without ever having a trial. After she languished in prison for 20 years, California passed a law allowing incarcerated survivors of abuse to reopen their cases. The documentary follows the story of Debbie and her two pro-bono rookie attorneys, as they encounter the corrupt and politically driven twists and turns of the criminal justice system.


Following the screening, Senator Ruth Hassell-Thompson and Assemblymember Jeffrion Aubry, will speak about their pending legislation: the Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act (A.7874-A/S.5436). The proposed Act, recently introduced in the NY State Legislature, is the only bill in the country that would allow judges to sentence survivors to significantly lower sentences and Alternative-to-Incarceration programs.

There will also be a thought-provoking panel discussion with Joshua Safran, one of Debbie’s attorneys, and NY advocates about the intersection of abuse and women’s incarceration. Advocates will also be on hand to inform you about ways to join the Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act Campaign.

Co-hosted by the Women in Prison Project of the Correctional Association of NY, STEPS to End Family Violence and the Prisoner Reentry Institute at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

This free screening is made possible by the New York Women’s Foundation and is open to the public. However, we are accepting RSVPs prior to the screening.  Please contact at Jesenia A. Santana or call her (646) 315-7626 and include how many seats you are reserving and the name(s) of those attending.  Seats are reserved until 10 minutes before start time.
 
Thursday, January 19th 6:30-9:00pm

John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Room 2200 Multi-Purpose Room, North Hall 2nd Fl.
445 West 59th Street, New York, NY 10019



2. LEGISLATION - ON JANUARY 4, 2012, MANY BILLS WERE REINTRODUCED, INCLUDING MOST OF THE 26 BILLS WE REPORTED ON IN JULY, WHICH ARE BACK IN THE COMMITTEES WHERE WE LEFT THEM AT THE END OF 2011. HERE ARE THE EXCEPTIONS:

A7782/S5427 - Aubry/Hassell-Thompson BAN THE BOX BILL
was reintroduced in the Assembly and then sent to Investigations and Government Operations.

S0107/A5355 - Montgomery/Aubry EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
Was vetoed by Senate Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections Committee last session. It’s been referred back to the Committee this session, and also to the Assembly’s Crime Committee.

S0338/A0154 - Montgomery/Aubry MERIT TIME BILL
It’s been referred back to the Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections Committee where it was defeated last session.

S0476-A/A7870 - Nozzolio/Tediso $7 CO-PAYMENTS FOR PRISON MEDICAL CARE
It was referred back to the Assembly where it died*, and was returned to the Senate where it was sent to the Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections Committee.

S2057 - Kruger no Assembly bill 85% OF MINIMUM (of an indeterminate sentence) MUST BE SERVED
Hasn’t been reintroduced so far.

S3537/A07015 Griffo FIVE MEMBER BOARDS FOR VOS
Referred to Senate Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections Committee, amended, and sent back, but not reintroduced in Assembly so far.

S3645-C/A 7015-B - Griffo/Spano “BRITTANY’S LAW” VFO REGISTRY
Died in Assembly*, sent back to Senate, referred to Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections Committee

S3747/A8478 - Nozzolio/Giglio FRP BILL
Died in Assembly*, returned to Senate, referred to Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections Committee

S5374/A7939 - Duane/Aubry THE SAFE PAROLE ACT
Senator Perkins and Assembly Members Stevenson, Farrel, and Gottfried have added their names as sponsors. (If they represent you, a message of appreciation would be a good move on your part.)

*
FYI: A bill needs to be passed in both houses, so those that have died in the assembly will go nowhere this session. [I’m still learning. Last July I told readers that Senate bills got new numbers every year that they were reintroduced. That appears not to be so. ]



3. NYS PAROLE REFORM CAMPAIGN IS PRESENTING A WORKSHOP AND YOU AND YOUR REPRESENTATIVES IN THE LEGISLATURE ARE INVITED

NYS PRC will be hosting a workshop at the Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic & Asian Legislative Caucus Weekend, ON FEB. 18 IN ALBANY.


Title:  CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERIES, Parole Release Decisions in the Era of Reintegration

Purpose:  To provide perspectives and concrete strategies for creating a parole model that advances public safety and promotes successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society, particularly in those communities of color which are disproportionately impacted by mass incarceration. 

Format:   A panel of 6 participants and a moderator. The panel will answer questions posed by the moderator and from the audience. 

Moderator: Glenn Martin from the Fortune Society.  
Panel Members:  (because not all are yet confirmed, some are listed only by the group they represent)
          Julia Long - formerly incarcerated for defending herself, member of Alb. County Gun Violence Prevention Task Force Advisory Comm
          Larry White - formerly incarcerated person, community organizer for Fortune Society, social and criminal justice activist 
          Incarcerated Persons - members of the Second Look Org. at Sullivan Correctional Facility [by video]
          Assembly Member - Jeffrion Aubry -  Sponsor of the SAFE Parole Act, A7939 
          A member of the NYS Parole Board - (specific commissioner has not been confirmed)
          Ariel Igartua - daughter of incarcerated man recently denied parole
 
Sponsors of the workshop are: Sen. Perkins, Sen. G. Rivera, A.M. Aubry, A.M. Stevenson


You and your legislative representatives are invited, particularly if they are a member of the Caucus. You can help get this bill passed by inviting them to this workshop which will show why it’s in their best interest to support a bill so many of their constituents support.

There will be transportation from NYC to the Capitol. For more information or to reserve a seat on the bus, please contact Larry White at lw77a3272@yahoo.com.

Members of the Caucus: 

SENATE CAUCUS MEMBERS: Eric Adams, Martin Malave Dilan, Ruth Hassell-Thompson, Shirley L. Huntley, Velmanette Montgomery, Kevin S. Parker, José R. Peralta, Bill Perkins, Gustavo Rivera, John Sampson, Jose M. Serrano, Malcolm A. Smith, Andrea Stewart-Cousins


ASSEMBLY CAUCUS MEMBERS: Carmen E. Arroyo, Jeffrion L. Aubry, Inez D. Barron, William F. Boyland, Jr., Nelson L. Castro, Barbara M. Clark, Vivian E. Cook, Marcos A. Crespo, Herman D. Farrell, Jr., David F. Gantt, Vanessa L. Gibson, Carl E. Heastie, Earlene Hooper, Hakeem Jeffries, Guillermo Linares, Grace Meng, Francisco P. Moya, Samuel D. Roberts, Robert J. Rodriguez, Eric A. Stevenson, Crystal D. Peoples-Stokes, N. Nick Perry, J. Gary Pretlow, Philip Ramos, Jose Rivera, Naomi Rivera, Annette Robinson, Michele R. Titus, Keith L.T. Wright, Felix Ortiz



4. THE NEW YORK STATE PRISONER JUSTICE COLUMN

Dear Building Bridges Readers,

The English novelist Charles Dickens begins one of his books by saying, “It was the best of times; it was the worst of times.” Our times, too, are the best and the worst.

The U.S. prison system continues to incarcerate more people, for longer, than anywhere in the world, under brutal conditions with little hope of positive outcomes for prisoners, their families, and their communities. You, Building Bridges readers, know the story all too well: children as young as 13 tried as adults; disproportionate arrest, sentencing, and prison for people of color; alarming rates of long-term isolation; a parole system that gives people no way out. From politicians to prosecutors to judges to guards, there are too many who have a stake in keeping the system the way it is or making it worse, who gain advantages from portraying offenders as demons and whipping up fear and hate.

So what could possibly make a prisoner justice advocate say this is the best of times? A growing public perception that there is something very wrong with mass incarceration, and a growing movement to challenge and change it. The following are a few examples:

Michelle Alexander’s book, The New Jim Crow, has caught on like wildfire, and sparked a movement. It makes the case that mass incarceration, including the so-called war on drugs, is the leading form of racial injustice in our time. And before that, years of grass-roots action against harsh drug sentences won some reforms in New York and nationally.

A number of coalitions opposed to long-term solitary confinement and other forms of lockdown have sprung up. They have been presenting evidence that long-term isolation equals torture. Last year, hundreds of brave California prisoners called attention to this issue with a series of hunger strikes across the state.

Anti-death penalty and innocence movements have gained traction and visibility. They not only show that the death penalty is immoral and ineffective; they also call the whole system into question. If some death row prisoners are innocent, what about prisoners in the rest of the criminal justice system? And speaking of innocent death row prisoners, the most famous of them, former Black Panther Mumia Abu-Jamal, just successfully got his death sentence overturned! Mumia was wrongly convicted for the shooting of a police officer in Philadelphia in 1981. His supporters never gave up for 30 years. They are not done fighting yet -- they say life in prison for an innocent person is not justice.

In this column last month, we told how New York State Prisoner Justice, in collaboration with other organizations and individuals, was providing regular teach-ins on prison issues at Occupy Wall Street. This month, New York State Prisoner Justice, along with the Center for Law and Justice and the Occupy Albany People of Color Caucus, presented a well-attended and successful teach-in to Occupy Albany and other members of the Albany community. The panelists said that people in prison and formerly incarcerated people are some of the most marginalized members of the 99%. They discussed the links between the Occupy movement and the prisoner justice movement. Two former long-termers on the panel talked about the lack of rehabilitation and preparation for re-entry.

Most of these different movements and campaigns agree that mass incarceration doesn’t solve social problems, it makes them worse. Instead, our society needs programs that give people positive opportunities to realize their potential and contribute to their communities; and that give the members of those same communities tools to hold each other accountable. We haven’t won the war against mass incarceration, but we haven’t lost it either. In this column each month, we will share some of the victories, obstacles, and lessons of the movement for prisoner justice. Comments? Write us at NYSPJN, 33 Central Avenue, Albany NY 12210 or nysprisonerjustice@gmail.com.



5. PAROLE NEWS - NOVEMBER & DECEMBER RELEASES; SUMMARY OF 2011 RELEASES; ANDREA EVAN'S MEMO TO PAROLE BOARD; RULING IN THWAITES'S ARTICLE 78; APPELLATE DIVISION DISMISSES GRAZIANO APPEAL.

NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2011 PAROLE BOARD RELEASES – A1 VIOLENT FELONS –
DIN #s through 1999 unofficial research from parole database

NOVEMBER Totals

Total Interviews....... # Released...... # Denied.. Rate of Release
18 Initials........................ 1...................... 17............ 6%
84 reappearances............ 22.................... 62............ 26%
102 interviews................. 23.................... 79............ 23%

NOVEMBER Initial Releases

Facility.....Sentence.......... Offense
Collins..... 15-Life............ Murder 2

NOVEMBER Reappearances

Facility............. Sentence.......... Offense.... # of Board
Altona.............. 25-Life............ Murder 2......... 5th
Auburn............ 26 ½-Life......... Kidnap 1.......... 5th *
Cayuga............ 20-Life............ Murder 2......... 4th
Collins............. 20-Life............ Murder 2......... 3rd
Fishkill............. 25-Life............ Murder 2......... 3rd
Fishkill............. 25-Life............ Murder 2......... 3rd
Fishkill............. 25-Life............ Murder 2......... 4th
Fishkill............. 15-Life............ Murder 2......... 9th
Fishkill............. 15-Life............ Murder 2......... 4th *
Fishkill............. 25-Life............ Murder 2......... 5th
Fishkill............. 25-Life............ Murder 2......... 3rd
Greene............. 15-Life............ Murder 2......... 3rd *
Lincoln............. 15-Life............ Murder 2......... 11th
Marcy.............. 20-Life............ Murder 2......... ?? **
Mt. McGregor... 22 ½ ................Murder 2......... 3rd
Otisville........... 20-Life............ Murder 2......... 2nd
Otisville........... 20-Life............ Murder 2......... 6th *
Sullivan............ 20-Life............ Murder 2......... 2nd
Taconic............ 20-Life............ Murder 2......... 6th
Woodbourne.... 15-Life............ Murder 2......... 3rd
Woodbourne.... 15-Life............ Murder 2......... 6th
Woodbourne.... 15-Life............ Murder 2......... 3rd *

*for deportation only **returned in 2005


DECEMBER Totals

Total Interviews.........# Released...... # Denied.. Rate of Release
15 Initials........................ 0...................... 15.... 0%
69 reappearances............ 14.................... 55.... 20%
84 interviews................... 14.................... 70.... 17%
1 medical release

NO DECEMBER INITIAL RELEASES

DECEMBER Reappearances

Facility.............Sentence........ Offense # of Board
Auburn............ 20-Life............ Murder 2................. 3rd
Bedford Hills....25-Life............. M2 + K1-2x............ 2nd
Bedford Hills.... 25-Life............ M2 + K1-2x............ 2nd
Cape Vincent... 15-Life............ Murder 2................. 5th
Cayuga............ 20-Life............ Murder 2................. 6th
Cayuga............ 15-Life............ Murder 2................. 5th
Eastern............ 15-Life............ Murder 2................. 4th?
Fishkill............. 8 2/3-Life....... JO Murder 2............. 5th?
Mt. McGregor...15-Life............ Murder 2................. 2nd
Otisville........... 15-Life............ Murder 2................. 7th
Sing Sing......... 18-Life............ M2 + K1-2x............ 3rd?
Southport ........18-Life............ Murder 2................. 4th
Taconic............ 25-Life............ M2 + K1-2x............ 2nd
Woodbourne.....20-Life........... Murder 2................. 5th

Bedford Hills.... 20-Life............ Murder 2......... MEDICAL *
* at year 16 of sentence

Note: In February we will not have any parole release statistics for you. They are not released to the parole website until too close to our deadline to complete the work involved. December was an exception. In March we will publish January’s releases.


ANNUAL REPORT OF 2011 A1VF PAROLE BOARD HEARINGS COMPILED FROM UNOFFICIAL RESEARCH** USING PAROLE WEBSITE DATABASE.

2011 A1VF SUMMARIES AND COMPARISONS:

INITIAL BOARDS:
218 interviews, 26 releases; for a release rate of 12%. Two of those 26 were rescinded. In 2007 there were 41 initial releases, 25 in 2008 after the hearing held by Senator Nozzolio, in 2009 there were 38 initial releases, and 39 in 2010, making 2011 the second lowest number of release decisions, as well as the second lowest rate of releases, in the last five years. Three of those initial release decisions were for deportation only, making the % of those released to their home communities 10.5%

REAPPEARANCES:
979 interviews, 209 releases; for a release rate of 21%. That is the second highest in the past five years. 31 of the 209 were released for deportation making the rate released to the U.S. 18%. Four of the 209 were released to another state and another 4 were released on special consideration hearings.

MEDICAL PAROLE:
This year saw what is believed to be the first A1VF’s released on medical parole. A man was released on a medical parole board, although he had been parole eligible since 2002. A woman was released on a “true” medical parole board several years before reaching her parole eligibility date.

GENDER BREAKDOWN:
Of the 218 initial interviews, 212 were males (97%), 6 were females (3%). Of the 26 initial releasees, 25 were males (96%), 1 was female (4%).

Of the 979 reappearance interviews, 957 were males (98%), 22 were women (2%). Of the 209 releasees, 201 were male (96%) and 8 were female (4%).

RACIAL/ETHNIC BREAKDOWN:
Of the 218 INITIAL interviews, 123 (56%) were Black, 58 (27%) were Hispanic, and 32 (15%) were White. Of the 26 initial releasees, 16 were black (62%), 8 were Hispanic (31%) and 2 were White (8%). (Remaining numbers are other and unknown ethnicities.)


Of the 979 REAPPEARANCE interviews, 522 (53%) were Black, 239 (24%) were Hispanic, and 208 (21%) were White. Of the 209 releasees, 116 were Black (55%), 61 (29%) were Hispanic [or 51 and 24% excluding deportations], and 28 (13%) White. Remaining numbers are other and unknown ethnicities.

PRISON CATEGORY:
MEDIUMS: 728 (61%) of all interviews with 178 released (75% of releasees).

MAXIMUMS: 451 (38%) of all interviews with 57 released (24% of releasees).
The remaining interviews were in other facilities such as Walsh Medical Center or CNYPC.

HOW MANY BOARDS--NUMBER OF RELEASES--PERCENT OF TOTAL (235):
First ----26--11 %
Second - 41--17%
Third ---43--18%
Fourth --28--12%
Fifth----30--13%
Sixth ---24--10%
Seventh-12*--5% *includes 1 medical release
Eighth--14---6%
Ninth---5----2%
Tenth --7----3%
Eleventh-4--1.6%
Twelfth -2--0.8%

AGES AND LENGTH OF INCARCERATION:
9 of those released were between the ages of 73 and 83, all on reappearances.
26 of those released were in prison since the 1970’s, one since the 1960’s, 111 since the 1980’s and 97 since the 1990’s.
[2 of the initial releasees were born after 27 of the other releasees had gone to prison.]

**None of the previous numbers are official or scientific; nor account for any de novo boards. The results are based upon unofficial, best efforts research. Please FOIL the Board of Parole for exact and official data.



ANDREA EVANS'S MEMO TO THE PAROLE BOARD TELLS THEM: "YOU MUST ASCERTAIN WHAT STEPS AN INMATE HAS TAKEN TOWARD THEIR REHABILITATION AND THE LIKELIHOOD OF THEIR SUCCESS ONCE RELEASED TO PAROLE SUPERVISION."

TO: Members of the Board of Parole: Terrence X. Tracy, Counsel; Terrence Saunders, Chief Administrative Law Judge; Lester Edwards, Secretary to the Board



FROM: Andrea W. Evans, Chairwoman

DATE: October 5, 2011

RE: Recent Amendment of Executive Law §259-c(4)



Through the enactment of Chapter 62 of the Laws of 2011, Part C, subpart A, §38-b, Executive Law §259-c(4) was amended to provide that the Board of Parole shall: 
“establish written procedures for its use in making parole decisions as required by law, such written procedures shall incorporate risk and needs principles to measure the rehabilitation of persons appearing before the board, the likelihood of success of such persons upon release and assist members of the state board of parole in determining which inmates may be released to parole supervision;”



As you know, members of the Board have been working with staff of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision in the development of a transition accountability plan (“TAP”). This instrument which incorporates risk and needs principles, will provide a meaningful measurement of an inmate’s rehabilitation. With respect to the practices of the Board, the TAP instrument will replace the inmate status report that you have utilized in the past when assessing the appropriateness of an inmate’s release to parole supervision. To this end, members of the Board were afforded training in July 2011 in the use of the TAP instrument where it exists. Accordingly, as we proceed, when staff have prepared a TAP instrument for a parole eligible inmate, you are to use that document when making your parole release decisions. In instances where a TAP instrument has not been prepared, you are to continue to utilize the inmate status report It is also important to note that the Board was afforded training in September 2011 in the usage of the COMPAS Risk and Needs Assessment tool to understand the interplay between that instrument and the TAP instrument, as well as understanding what each of the risk levels mean.



Please know that the standard for assessing the appropriateness for release, as well as the statutory criteria you must consider has not changed through the aforementioned legislation. Consequently, in all cases you must consider
(i) the institutional record including program goals and accomplishments, academic achievements, vocational education, training or work assignments,therapy and interactions with staff and inmates;
(ii) performance, if any, as a participant in a temporary release program;
(iii) release plans including community resources, employment, education and training and support services available to the inmate;
(iv) any deportation order issued by the federal government against the inmate while in the custody of the department and any recommendation regarding deportation made by the commissioner of the department pursuant to section one hundred forty-seven of the correction law;
(v) any statement made to the board by the crime victim or the victim’s representative, where the crime victim is deceased or is mentally or physically incapacitated;
(vi) the length of the determinate sentence to which the inmate would be subject had he or she received a sentence pursuant to section 70.70 or section 70.71 of the penal law for a felony defined in article two hundred twenty or article two hundred twenty-one of the penal law;
(vii) the seriousness of the offense with due consideration to the type of sentence, length of sentence and recommendations of the sentencing court, the district attorney, the attorney for the inmate, the pre-sentence probation report as well as considera-tion of any mitigating and aggravating factors, and activities following arrest prior to confinement; and
(viii) prior criminal record, including the nature and pattern of offenses, adjustment to any previous probation or parole supervision and institutional confinement. See Executive Law §259-i(2){c){A}. As noted by the New York State Court of Appeals in Siimon v. Travis. 95 N.Y,2d 470 (2000), the above-stated criteria reflect the strong rehabilitative component of section 259-i of the Executive Law.



Therefore, in your consideration of the statutory criteria set forth in Executive Law §259-i(2)(c)(A)(i) through (viii), you must ascertain what steps an inmate has taken toward their rehabilitation and the likelihood of their success once released to parole supervision. In this regard, any steps taken by an inmate toward effecting their rehabilitation, in addition to all aspects of their proposed release plan, are to be discussed with the inmate during the course of their interview and considered in your deliberations.



cc: Elizabeth Glazer, Deputy Secretary; 
Mary Kavaney, Assistant Deputy Secretary; Brian Fischer, Commissioner; Anthony J. Annucci, Executive Deputy Commissioner; Angela Jimenez, Deputy Commissioner


.


THWAITES DECISION: JUDGE ORDERS NYS PAROLE BOARD TO RETROACTIVELY APPLY A NEW PROVISION REQUIRING IT TO CONSIDER THE REHABILITATION OF AN INMATE AND NOT BASE A DENIAL OF RELEASE ON AN OFFENSE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED DECADES IN THE PAST.

Supreme Court of the State of NY, Orange County, Hon. Lawrence H. Ecker, J.S.C., Presiding

Douglas Thwaites vs NYS Board of Parole



Facts: Petitioner was convicted by jury of Murder 2 in 1986, and sentenced to 25-Life. He is now 67 and has served over 26 years. When released he is subject to deportation. He appeared before his first parole board in March 2010. He was denied and held for 24 months to March 2012. His denial was couched in the familiar boiler plate language, claiming notice of his institutional accomplishments and then saying the instant offense leads the Board to conclude his release would be incompatible with the welfare of society and deprecate the seriousness of the crime so as to undermine respect for the law.



Petitioner appealed and the Board affirmed its decision denying parole.



Petitioner filed an Article 78 contending the decision 1) was arbitrary and capricious; 2) denied due process in failing to offer any guidance or additional reasons; 3) failed to consider sentencing minutes; 4) failed to follow guidelines; 5) failed to apply procedures for deportation only; and 6) abuse of discretion in focusing exclusively on the instant offense.



Court ruled the lack of sentencing minutes was not sufficient grounds. The court reviewed the language of 259-i and placed great significance on 259-c(4) which was recently amended to require the Board to promulgate new procedures incorporating risk and needs principles to measure rehabilitation. The court then referred to the interpretations of Prof. Phillip Genty, as reported in the NYLJ, Sept 1, 2011. Even though the changes went into effect after the petitioner’s parole hearing, the court concluded that remedial amendments should apply [remedial statutes have been regarded as an exception to any general rule against retroactivity] and entitle petitioner to a new parole hearing utilizing risk assessment procedures. It accuses the Board of employing past-focused rhetoric, not future-focused risk assessment analysis. Thus failing to sustain a rational determination on the inquiry at hand: whether there is a reasonable probability that, if such inmate is released, he will live and remain at liberty without violating the law.



The court found the Board’s decision denying parole to be arbitrary and capricious, irrational, and improper.

The court granted the petition, annulled the Board’s determination, vacated the denial, and directs the board to, within 30 days*, hold a new hearing with a different panel of the Board. Dated 12/21/11.
 


*30 days would be January 21, 2012. The DOCCS website lists his next hearing as March 2012. The Parole Board calendar does not list him in January, February, or March 2012. In neither place is there any indication that the judge’s order will be followed.


GRAZIANO V. EVANS: THE APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT AFFIRMS ALBANY ACTING SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ROGER D. MCDONOUGH IN DISMISSING THE STATE COURT ACTION. DECIDED AND ENTERED: DECEMBER 22 2011.



Appellate Division, Third Department

[This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the official reports.]



In the most recent development in the case of Peter Graziano, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Appellant, vs. Andrea W. Evans, as Chair of the New York State Division of Parole, et al., Respondents. 

Thomas E. Mercure, a judge on the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division. granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint.



HISTORY: In 1986, plaintiff Graziano was convicted of murder in the second degree for which he received the minimum sentence, 15 years to life in prison. He appeared before the Board of Parole five times between 2001 and 2008, and was denied parole each time. Plaintiff was ultimately unsuccessful in challenging the Board's determinations denying parole. In 2006, plaintiff Graziano commenced a class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging that the Board had violated the US Constitution by adopting an unofficial policy of denying parole release to all prisoners convicted of A-1 violent felony offenses, without consideration of statutorily mandated factors. That action was dismissed upon a finding that plaintiff and the other class members had failed to state federal due process, equal protection or ex post facto claims.



In 2009, plaintiff commenced the current action on behalf of a class that is identical to that certified in the federal action — prisoners who were convicted of A-1 felonies, are eligible for parole release, and were denied parole after their most recent hearing based upon the seriousness or nature of their offense. As in the federal action, plaintiff alleged that the Board had adopted an unofficial policy resulting in the systematic denial of parole to A-1 violent felony offenders based solely on the nature of the underlying crime and without consideration of the statutorily mandated criteria set forth in Executive Law § 259-i (2) (c) (A).



Unlike the federal action, plaintiff's challenges were grounded in allegations that the Board had violated Executive Law § 259-i, rather than the constitutional claims rejected by the United States District Court. Plaintiff sought, among other things, a declaration that the Board violated Executive Law § 259-i, an injunction enjoining the Board from denying parole without due consideration of all factors set forth in section 259-i, and an order directing retraining and new supervisory procedures for the Board.



Defendants (Evans and the Parole Board) moved to dismiss the complaint, and plaintiff cross-moved for class certification and to consolidate this action with his then-pending CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging his 2008 denial of parole. The Supreme Court granted Parole’s motion, dismissed the complaint, and denied Graziano's cross motion as academic. 

Graziano appealed, and the Appellate Division, Third Department affirmed the Supreme court’s ruling on the grounds that Plaintiff has previously litigated this claim. The Appellate Division agreed with the Supreme Court that the doctrine of res judicata bars "all other claims arising out of the same transaction" — such as those raised here — "even if based upon different theories or if seeking a different remedy" Accordingly, the Appellate Division, Third Division ruled that the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint brought by Graziano..





6. PRISONERS OF THE CENSUS - VICTORY IN IMPLEMENTATION OF LAW ENDING PRISON-BASED GERRYMANDERING.



Last month we reported that a Supreme Court Judge threw out the lawsuit by upstate Senate Republicans and upheld the law ending prison-based gerrymandering. The landmark 2010 law required the state to count incarcerated people as residents of their home addresses for redistricting purposes.  The rejected lawsuit argued that the state was required to use the Census Bureau counts (which count people in prison as residents of the prison) when drawing state and county legislative district lines. The state constitution says that incarcerated people remain residents of their pre-incarceration homes, but the Senate Republicans wanted to claim the political clout of the prison populations.



After the decision was announced, it initially appeared that the New York Senate did not intend to implement the law which they had previously threatened. On January 5, those fears were laid to rest when the legislative task force called LATFOR released the population data to be used for state and local redistricting that properly counts incarcerated people at their home addresses. Details at www.prisonersofthecensus.org.


Building Bridges is published by Prison Action Network as a way of communicating with our members.

If you would like to join, please send a note.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

DECEMBER 2011













PEACE ON EARTH, GOOD WILL TO ALL!


Dear Reader,

Although it’s a holiday season for many of us, I always hesitate to wish readers a Merry or Happy Holiday because I don’t know how merry or happy you can be, either in prison, or at home missing your incarcerated loved one. So instead I send wishes that you will experience something wonderful whenever and wherever you are. Sometimes joy comes in a very small package at a very unexpected moment, so I hope you will keep your heart open and ready. Joy to the world!

Please be well, keep the faith, share the news, and for everyone’s sake, get involved!
The Editor



Article Summaries:


1. Attica - The Correctional Association (CA) of New York visited Attica C. F. on April 12 and 13, 2011 and reports that Attica has changed significantly since 1971, although some severe problems do persist. So severe that Director Soffiyah Elijah concludes that it is broken beyond repair, and Governor Cuomo should shutter its doors forever.

2. Dorothy Day Apartment building on Riverside Dr. in West Harlem once was home to drug dealers but is now not only beautiful, but it also pulses with pride and hope and happiness. 


3. The Guardian Newspaper is interested in hearing from U.S. inmates, their families, prison guards or anyone whose life has been impacted by incarceration.


4. Hour Children, a Queens nonprofit group, is creating affordable housing in Long Island City for formerly incarcerated women trying to rebuild their lives. 


5. Job Op: Trinity Alliance of the Capital Region is seeking a program director for their SNUG program.


6. Legislation: 65%, Merit Time Bill, SAFE Parole Act, Domestic Violence Survivor Justice Act

7. NYS Parole Reform Campaign will present a workshop at the Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic & Asian Legislative Caucus Weekend in February. We continue to work on clarifying the changes to the current parole statute. Part 3 of Setting the Record Straight deals with Parole’s 3 R’s.


8. Column #2 of the New York State Prisoner Justice Network discusses their involvement with Occupy Wall Street and asks for your involvement in that work.

9. Parole News: TAP and COMPAS per Chairwoman Evans; October parole release decisions. 


10. Prisoner of the Census: An Albany judge has upheld a state law that counts inmates, for legislative reapportionment purposes, in their home community rather than the district in which they are incarcerated. 


11. Prison Legal Services is looking for lawyers to do pro-bono work and offers incentives.

12. Radio messages from home to those inside. CALLS FROM HOME is a gripping radio broadcast that brings the voices of prisoner families, former prisoners, poets, musicians, and everyday citizens to the airwaves. The broadcast consists of holiday greetings from family members to their loved ones behind bars and the over 2.4 million people incarcerated in the United States.

13. Taking Care of Business means communities building an inclusive environment for people returning home from prison, by Karima Amin, CEO of Prisoners Are People Too, Inc. 


14. Opportunities for getting involved in the struggle for justice: Actions, Events and Meetings.
 
[For copies of articles referred to in this issue, please send an email to PAN with a request stating # and title of article and date.]



1. ATTICA: CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION CONDUCTED AN INSPECTION OF THE PRISON AND POSTED THEIR FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND CONCLUSION ON THEIR WEBSITE.

INSPECTION
The Correctional Association (CA) of New York visited Attica Correctional Facility on April 12 and 13, 2011. They obtained surveys about general prison conditions from 269 inmates in general confinement, in addition to 63 program- or location-specific surveys from inmates in special programs and housing units.


Attica Correctional Facility: 2011 – The September 1971 Attica rebellion brought the plight of incarcerated individuals to the forefront of the nation’s consciousness. No longer would these invisible people experience invisible injustice behind brick walls and barbed wire fences. The prisoners’ demands included basic civil rights such as medical care, religious and political freedom, in addition to a living wage and opportunities for education and rehabilitation.

Prison conditions throughout New York State have come a long way in the past 40 years– inmates are afforded better medical care, opportunities for religious expression, and mandatory educational programming for those without a high school diploma or equivalent; however, we have a significant way to go – many prisons are still not safe, adequacy of medical care varies from facility to facility and most inmates are paid equal to or less per hour than in 1971. Attica has changed significantly since 1971, although some severe problems do persist.

The Correctional Association of NY is an independent, non-profit organization with unique legislative authority to inspect prisons and report its findings and recommendations to the legislature, the public and the press. Through monitoring, research, public education and policy recommendations, the CA strives to make the administration of justice in New York State more fair, efficient and humane.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
: Click here to read the Correctional Association’s findings and their followup recommendations.

CONCLUSION
In her article, “Beyond Repair”, Soffiyah Elijah, Executive Director of C. A., concludes with the following:
Unable to cast off its violent past, Attica Correctional Facility stands as a bold testament to inhumanity. It is broken beyond repair, and Governor Cuomo should shutter its doors forever. Symbolically, the closure of the facility would serve as an acknowledgment of the violence and brutality inflicted upon the prisoners of Attica at the hands of the state. Fiscally, prison closures continue to make sense for our cash-strapped state. Recognizing the inefficiency of New York’s over-reliance on incarceration, Governor Cuomo has already designated several facilities for closure. These downsizing efforts should continue, and Attica should be next on the Governor’s list.
[To read the article click here. ]



2. DOROTHY DAY APARTMENTS IN WEST HARLEM

In his September 23, 2011 NY Times Op-Ed, “It Takes a Village”, Charles Blow describes the Dorothy Day Apartments on Riverside Drive in West Harlem. [The following is a condensation. For the complete article click here]

The building is the sixth in the neighborhood run by Broadway Housing Communities, and the first to include a day care center serving both the building and the community. This former drug den is not only beautiful, but it also pulses with pride and hope and happiness. It’s just what I needed to see. Writing about children and the poor and the vulnerable these days, there aren’t very many bright spots — but this is one.

The children are bathed by natural light that floods into the basement through skylights. The floors are covered by beautiful green ceramic tile made to look like slate. The walls are painted a sunrise yellow, lined with thick wooden moldings and covered with well-framed pieces of art — some by the children, some donated. The courtyard, which had been filled with six feet of garbage, is covered with mats and used as an area where wee little legs that barely have kneecaps can be folded into funky shapes for daily yoga. Above the day care center are six floors of housing for 190 people, more than half of whom are children and all of whom were either homeless or in extreme poverty. Many of the adults are the hardest cases: those recovering from drug addiction, those with chronic diseases like H.I.V. and those with mental disabilities. In fact, most of the adults suffer from some form of disability. And on the top floor is an art gallery that opens onto a sweeping veranda, lined with flowering plants and with some of the most magnificent Hudson River views in the city.

There are no security guards. There is no commotion. There are no signs of institutional living like names above doors. There isn’t even so much as a crayon mark on any of the walls. This is an oasis of civility and tranquility and culture inhabited — and to some degree, self-policed — by people whom the world would rob of those dignities.

So why so much emphasis on beauty and art, I asked? One administrator responded resolutely: “You don’t just give a person four walls to live in. You give them something to be inspired by.” Another administrator said that the environment helped to “stabilize the parents to provide a platform for the children.” And those children, she said, can create “pathways out of poverty” for the whole family.

The Dorothy Day Apartments have been open since 2003, and they have had no arrests and no teenage pregnancies, unless you count the girl who was pregnant when she moved in. Most of the children went through the Head Start program in the basement, which now mostly serves the surrounding community. None of the children have dropped out of school. A handful have even earned scholarships to the city’s better private schools. Of the 10 children who have graduated from high school, eight have gone on to college and one has just graduated from college. (None of the adults in the building have ever been to college.)

The building runs mentoring programs and literacy programs and English as a second language programs. It maintains a computer lab and this week launched a partnership with what is essentially an international, Internet-based book club for boys in the building. (The girls’ group will begin next week.) It’s fantastic.

The cost of the building plus renovations was $17 million. So if it houses 190 people, that works out to about $89,500 a person, not including most of the children served by the day care center. According to the New York State Commission of Correction, 1,000 new jail beds will have been built between the end of 2007 and the end of 2011 in the counties of Albany, Essex, Rensselaer and Suffolk at a cost of $100,000 per bed. Furthermore, as Broadway Housing Communities points out on its Web site, “permanent supportive housing for an individual costs taxpayers $12,500 annually, compared to annual costs of $25,000 for an emergency shelter cot; $60,000 for a prison cell; and $125,000 for a psychiatric hospital bed.”



3. THE GUARDIAN NEWS (www.guardiannews.com) IS STARTING A NEW SERIES ON AMERICAN PRISONS AND THE IMPACT OF INCARCERATION ON INDIVIDUALS AND COMMUNITIES. THEY INVITE YOUR STORY:

We are interested in hearing from inmates, their families, prison guards or anyone whose life has been impacted negatively or otherwise by the system of incarceration. If you would like to contribute to the series, please write to: Sadhbh Walshe, The Guardian, PO Box 1466, New York, NY 10150. Or send an email.



4. HOUSING FOR FORMERLY INCARCERATED WOMEN BEING BUILT IN QUEENS BY HOUR CHILDREN

According to the NY Daily News, Tuesday, November 08, 2011 in an article by Sam Levin, the nonprofit group, Hour Children, is creating affordable housing in Long Island City for formerly incarcerated women trying to rebuild their lives.

For women leaving prison, one of the greatest challenges is finding a stable place to live. The organization is breaking ground next week on an 18-unit apartment building, on the heels of opening 14 units in Corona in September.


“These women need a place they can call home that is safe and supportive,” said Sister Tesa Fitzgerald, executive director and founder. “You have to build all those building blocks before you can launch a new life.”



5. JOB OPPORTUNITY: TRINITY ALLIANCE OF THE CAPITAL REGION WILL BE RESTARTING SNUG IN THE NEW YEAR. IN ANTICIPATION, THEY ARE SEEKING A PROGRAM DIRECTOR
.
Qualified candidates are those who:

have street and criminal justice experiences similar to the individuals SNUG targets

possess strong administrative, communication, management and computer skills

are able to lead and supervise a diverse workforce, and work within a team and an established agency setting

are able to work flexible, non-traditional hours

are willing to regularly undergo random substance abuse screenings

are able to demonstrate credibility and investment in working with a wide range of parties including but not limited to neighbors, family members and friends of victims and shooters, hospital emergency room personnel, the faith community and school and community public safety officials.

Cover letters and resumes may be emailed to: h.oberlander@ta-cr.org



6. LEGISLATION
Currently, Correction Law §803 grants 1/3 off indeterminate sentences and 1/7 off determinate sentences for good behavior. 2/3 is 66% so maybe this is what the readers who ask about “the 65% reduction” mean, only 66% is what’s served, not what’s taken off. Under §803, not every crime is eligible, especially not violent offenses. The Merit Time Bill S 338 didn’t change the amount of the time cut but it did include more categories of offenses (specifically violent crimes). It did not pass. It was vetoed in the Senate Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections committee.

A7939/S5374, The SAFE Parole Act, which I hope by now everyone understands remains sitting in committee, and has not become law. Until it passes, a person can still be denied parole based on the nature of their offense. See more about that in Articles 6 and 7, and at www.parolereform.org.

Another bill we support is the Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act, Bill A.7874/S.5436, which would allow alternative sentencing for some crimes committed as a result of domestic violence, and the possibility of re-sentencing for those already in prison. The Women In Prison Project provides a website just for that bill: www.dvsurvivorsjusticeact.org.



7. NYS PAROLE REFORM CAMPAIGN

NYS PRC will be hosting a workshop at the Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic & Asian Legislative Caucus Weekend.  Senator Perkins was instrumental in getting us on the agenda. Although the time has not been set, the date will probably be Saturday Feb 18, 2012. Our workshop is titled: CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERIES, Parole Release Decisions in the Era of Reintegration. It will “provide perspectives and concrete strategies for creating a parole model that advances public safety and promotes successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society, particularly those communities of color who are severely impacted by mass incarceration.” We will have a panel of 5-6 participants and a moderator.  The panel will answer questions posed by the moderator and from the audience. Stay tuned for more.

DECEMBER 19, JUDITH BRINK WILL BE PRESENTING THE SAFE PAROLE ACT TO PRISON FAMILIES OF NY IN ALBANY. See details in Article 14, under Albany Meetings.

ANOTHER ORGANIZATION SIGNS IN SUPPORT: The Staten Island Executive Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends brings to 63 the number of organizations who support the SAFE Parole Act. We feel very humbled by such an outpouring of support for something that was just a dream in the hearts of the families who attended Family Empowerment Day 4 in 2009. We’ve come a long way, and there’s much farther to go, but we will not give up until our men and women in prison are judged by who they have become and not for what they did in the past.

CORRECTING SOME MISUNDERSTANDINGS ABOUT THE 2011 CHANGES TO PAROLE BOARD POLICIES:
In 2011, the governor revised parole board policies when he merged DOCS and the Division of Parole. He left the Board as an independent body. In doing so he revised the parole statute to direct the Parole Board to:

1. consider the person’s readiness for reentry and reintegration.
2. establish procedures for including risk and needs principles in their decision making process.

The other 8 factors that the parole board must consider are the same as always, except they are now all in one place. They still include “the seriousness of the offense”.

In 2011 the Safe And Fair Evaluations (SAFE) Parole Act was introduced to the legislature as Senate Bill 5374 and Assembly Bill 7939. It is not a law. To become a law it will have to pass in both houses of the legislature and be signed by the governor.

[That’s a lot of people to convince to support something. It should be easy though, since it makes a whole lot of moral and financial sense. So don’t give up! Every person who joins this effort increases our chance of success. Talk to your legislators. Tell them you want this bill passed, and why. Call us if you need more information: 518 253 7533.]

Until the SAFE Parole Act passes there is nothing preventing the Parole Board from denying parole based on the nature of the crime.

SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT, PART 3 IN THE SERIES: RELEASE, REENTRY, REINTEGRATION: HOW THE SAFE PAROLE ACT IS NECESSARY FOR ALL THREE.

The Importance of the Safe and Fair Evaluations (S.A.F.E.) Parole Act in Making Decisions about Release, Reentry, and Reintegration

Penal Law 1.05 states that in addition to punishment (retribution), deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation there is a fifth goal: “the promotion of their [incarcerated people’s] successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society.” [emphasis added]

The purpose of this article is to define reintegration, and to show how necessary the SAFE Parole Act is in achieving it.

Reentry and reintegration are commonly thought of as meaning the same thing, but they are, in actuality, very different:

Reentry is the process of returning to one’s community and finding a way to get basic needs met - such as housing, food, employment - without resorting to criminal activities. Preparation for reentry starts in prison, with programs that prepare the person for life on the outside. In recent years outside agencies have gotten funding to meet reentry needs and continue to help a person remain at liberty without reverting to a life of crime. Parole needs to to create linkages for their clients with community agencies that can meet their subsistence needs, such as food, clothing, employment, medical care, and public assistance. Most community organizations offer case management to get a person back on their feet. Most don’t go any further.

Reintegration is established when the formerly incarcerated person has developed social ties that help him or her continue to live at liberty without breaking the law. This person needs to be connected with a new environment which encourages and rewards legitimate behaviors and attitudes. The shorter the period of incarceration, the easier this task will be.

Part of this new involvement is with groups such as neighborhood associations, faith groups, men’s groups, women’s groups; groups where he or she is accepted as a contributing member to the positive goals of the group. Reintegration is the last stage in our criminal justice system, and therefore it must be the goal of all the stages that precede it, from arrest forward. It’s the capacity to live at liberty without disobeying the law. The community must get involved in nurturing legitimate lifestyles in the lives of the men and women returning from prison.


In NYS’s criminal justice system the judicial system sets the punishment, which may include a period of incarceration. Prisons are responsible for providing deterrence and the tools for rehabilitation. The Parole Board’s job is to assess a person’s readiness to leave the incarceration stage behind and begin the process of reintegration.

This is where the SAFE Parole Act becomes necessary. Even with the recent revisions to the law, which mandate the use of a Transitional Accountability Plan and a Risk and Needs Assessment, the criminal justice system has not moved significantly closer to the fifth goal of reintegration. As long as the Parole Board can continue to base release decisions on the crime, which a person can never change, people who are truly ready to begin the process of reintegration will continue to be denied. The Safe and Fair Evaluations (S.A.F.E.) Parole Act doesn’t leave it up to the Parole Board to voluntarily create procedures that would lead to fairer parole hearings, it includes them right in the bill.


Unlike the recently implemented changes, the SAFE Parole Act is based on an understanding that what a person does, what his or her attitudes and behaviors have become over the course of many years, are the most important indicators of readiness for reintegration, and thus for release from prison.

Most importantly, if the parole applicant’s attitude and/or behavior does not meet their standards, the Parole Board must spell out what he or she must do in order to be considered ready for release to parole supervision. Once those requirements have been met, the person must be released.

No one can ever know for sure that another person will commit a crime. But there are good indicators in the SAFE PAROLE ACT, and the Parole Board can do no better than to base their decision on them.

TAP and R&NA will continue to be used by Parole’s Community Supervision once the person is back in society, and will extend until the person has reached the final goal of reintegration.

by Larry White



8. THE NEW YORK PRISONER JUSTICE NETWORK COLUMN

Dear Building Bridges Reader,

The New York State Prisoner Justice Network is honored to continue with our regular column for Building Bridges. This is column #2. Last month, we gave an overview of The NYS Prisoner Justice Network. This month we will discuss our involvement with Occupy Wall Street and ask for your involvement in that work. 

Occupy Wall Street is an international protest movement inspired by recent uprisings in Egypt, Tunisia, Greece, and Spain. In September, several hundred people gathered in Zuccotti Park in downtown Manhattan. What started as a relatively small number of activists quickly expanded into a global movement with over 950 occupations in over 85 countries. 

The Occupy Movement protests the huge gap in wealth between the 1% who control the world’s resources and the 99% who don’t. The Occupy Movement was started by mostly white middle-class students and quickly gained support from community organizations, labor unions, and Occupy The Hood, a project that links the Occupy Movement with existing organizing projects led mostly by poor people and people of color. 

The Occupy Movement has also sparked important debates about issues of liberation and justice: militarism, migration, racism and colonialism, sexism and gender, and how these issues intersect with the economic system. Many long term community activists are pushing the Occupy Movement to understand how poor people and people of color have been effectively organizing around these issues for generations and are the natural leaders of any movement for social change. 

The Occupy Movement has provided an important opportunity for the prison justice community in New York. Members of the New York State Prisoner Justice Network are holding weekly teach-ins on the prison industrial complex, the system that cages nearly 2.4 million people in the United States.


We are trying to help people understand how prisons and policing are connected to every other issue about social transformation, including jobs, schools, healthcare, housing and racial justice. We are also in the process of becoming a Formerly Incarcerated People’s Caucus at Occupy Wall Street, which would help bring the voices of those most impacted by prison into the regular debates of the Occupy Movement. 

Though our group includes formerly incarcerated people, family members of those currently incarcerated, and activists who work on prison and policing issues on the outside, we believe that the experience and expertise of people who currently survive behind prison walls must be heard and understood in order to transform this system and our broader society.
We would be grateful for your involvement in our work at Occupy Wall Street. You can participate by answering the following questions: 

What is the prison industrial complex? (In your own view - how you understand the system, how it impacts you and others). 

What should justice look like instead of prisons? 

We will include your responses in the content and analysis of future teach-ins. Please send responses to NYSPJN, 33 Central Avenue, Albany NY 12210 or nysprisonerjustice@gmail.com



9. PAROLE NEWS

TRANSITIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY PLANS (TAP) and RISK AND NEEDS ASSESSMENTS (COMPAS)

From the testimony of Andrea Evans, Chairwoman of the Board of Parole, before the Assembly Committee on Correction, Nov 10, 2011, we gained some further insight into how TAP and Risk and Needs Assessments will be used in parole decisions. The following information is from her written testimony to the Committee.

The Board has been working closely with the DOCCS in developing the TAP instrument. It will be the instrument that measures the rehabilitation of persons appearing before the Board, as well as their likelihood of success in the community when released. Each member of the Board has received training in the use of both the TAP instrument and a risk and needs instrument known as the COMPAS instrument. Currently the use of these instruments is being piloted in 3 correctional facilities for the purpose of establishing appropriate conditions of supervision. When the pilot phase is concluded, the Board will use them to assess the appropriateness of an inmate’s release to community supervision. Because the TAP instrument reflects an inmate’s overall effort toward his or her rehabilitation while incarcerated and draws upon information closely associated with their risk of re-offending, and their needs in order to become successful, the Board’s written procedures will call for the use and careful consideration of these documents.

As an interim measure, I have instructed the Board to use the TAP instrument where and when it has been prepared for a parole eligible inmate. I have emphasized that when the Board considers an inmate for parole, they must ascertain what steps he or he has taken toward their rehabilitation and the likelihood of their success once released to community supervision.

The one function that has been transferred from the Board to DOCCS is the granting of certificates of relief and certificates of good conduct. Last year the Board granted 1,695 such certificates. DOCCS has granted 1,581 since April 2011.



OCTOBER 2011 PAROLE BOARD RELEASES - A1 VIOLENT FELONIES - DIN’s through 1999
unofficial research from parole database


TOTALS
Total Interviews............... # Released....... # Denied.. Rate of release
18 Initials....................... 3...................... 15............ 17%
69 Reappearances........... 19.................... 50............ 28%
87 Total.......................... 22.................... 65............ 25%

OCTOBER INITIAL RELEASES
FACILITY.......... SENTENCE.....OFFENSE..... # of BOARD
Bare Hill........... 22-Life............ Murder 2......... 1st *
Fishkill............. 19-Life............ Murder 2......... 1st
Fishkill............. 20-Life............ Murder 2......... 1st
* for deportation

OCTOBER REAPPEARANCE RELEASES
FACILITY..........SENTENCE......OFFENSE..... # OF BOARD
Altona.............. 25-Life......Murder pre-74....... 8th
Attica...............4.5-Life......Murder 2............... 5th
Auburn............ 25-Life.......Murder 2................2nd
Auburn............ 25-Life.......Murder 2............... 2nd
Clinton............ 15-Life.......Murder 2............... 12th
Collins............. 15-Life.......Murder 2............... 11th
Franklin........... 16-Life.......Murder 2............... 3rd
Green Haven.... 28-Life.......Murder 2............... 2nd
Groveland ........20-Life.......Murder 2............... 5th
Mt. McGregor... 23-Life.......Murder 2............... 5th
Orleans............ 20-Life.......Murder 2................6th
Otisville........... 15-Life.......Murder 2............... 3rd
Otisville........... 15-Life.......Murder 2............... 4th
Otisville........... 25-Life.......Murder 2................2nd
Sullivan............ 15-Life.......Murder 2............... 3rd
Taconic............ 15-Life.......Murder 2............... 2nd
Upstate............15-Life......Murder 2............... 6th
Washington......15-Life......Murder 2............... 3rd
Woodbourne.... 20-Life......Murder 2 ................2nd




10. PRISONERS OF THE CENSUS

ALBANY JUDGE UPHOLDS LAW ON COUNTING PRISONERS

Early this month Supreme Court Justice Eugene P. Devine ruled to uphold the state law known as Part XX which requires that incarcerated people be counted in their home communities. not in the districts where they are imprisoned. An appeal may be made, but for 2012 redistricting purposes the law will be followed This will give all registered voters in NYS an equally weighted vote. The next step, hopefully, will be to give incarcerated citizens the right to vote.

Justice Devine said that even if the law "is the product of a power play by Democratic lawmakers to usurp the strength of the Republican Party," the law survives constitutional scrutiny. "Though inmates may be physically found in the locations of their respective correctional facilities at the time the census is conducted, there is nothing in the record to indicate that such inmates have any actual permanency in these locations or have intent to remain," he said.

 Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman, whose office defended the law that he championed as a state senator, called the ruling a "victory for fundamental fairness and equal representation." Read all about it




11. PRISONERS' LEGAL SERVICES IS LOOKING FOR LAWYERS WILLING TO DONATE THEIR TIME TO REPRESENT PRISONERS ALLEGING A VIOLATION OF THEIR RIGHTS

BENEFITS;
Education about a new area of law, litigation experience and CLE credits.

Support from PLS, including use of office space and access to office supplies and equipment.

Through partnerships with several NY law schools, volunteer attorneys will have the option of utilizing law students for case-related research and writing tasks.

PLS provides professional liability insurance for all volunteer/pro bono attorneys.

Interested lawyers may contact Samantha Howell at showell@plsny.org or PLS, 41 State St., Suite M112, Albany NY 12207




12. CALLS FROM HOME is a gripping radio broadcast that brings the voices of prisoner families, former prisoners, poets, musicians, and everyday citizens to the airwaves. The broadcast consists of holiday greetings from family members to their loved ones behind bars and the over 2.4 million people incarcerated in the United States.

The show is now available for you to listen and to share with your friends.

Spread the joy this holiday season and bring powerful, moving voices to the airwaves

Get involved with a national campaign to address the cost of prison phone calls and find out about special tools you cn use with Calls from Home.

Working together we created an amazing radio program. Thanks for your support.




13. TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS IS TAKING CARE OF EACH ANOTHER
 
It is a fact that each of us is multi-dimensional. I am a mother, teacher, woman, friend, taxpayer, golden ager, and storyteller and the list goes on. Why do we have so much trouble realizing that this is true of everyone, including our incarcerated population and our formerly incarcerated neighbors? These groups are also multi-dimensional and yet we have a tendency to paint them all with the same brush and to label them in ways that fail to acknowledge their growth and development as fully human. We see them as “criminals” and “ex-cons” and nothing more. We don’t view them as parents, senior citizens, veterans, or simply as sisters and brothers and children who got caught in their wrongdoing. Some of them are living with long-standing and long-ignored mental health issues or issues of substance abuse. It seems easier to look the other way and to ignore the poverty and racism and other crime generative factors that may have led to incarceration. One important part of “taking care of business” is taking care of each other. Sadly, too many of us have failed to honor this charge.
 
When formerly incarcerated people come home, they are frequently faced with people in the community who shun them, broken promises of reentry help that never materialize, and false steps to reintegration that may thwart their desire to become community assets. In this community, there are a few people whose criminal histories are public knowledge. They are mentors, ministers, paralegals, authors, activists, business owners and more. They are hard workers who are laying some of the bricks that we need to create strong, vibrant, and progressive neighborhoods. They are our sisters and brothers. Working with them in the business of building community is everyone’s responsibility.

By Karima Amin, Dir. Prisoners Are People Too, Inc.




14. OPPORTUNITIES FOR GETTING INVOLVED IN THE STRUGGLE FOR JUSTICE; ACTIONS, EVENTS, MEETINGS.

ACTIONS: Many communities in our state have OCCUPY movements; they need people there talking about criminal justice issues. Everyone has a voice at their General Assemblies and in fact women and minorities are often given preference in speaking order. There are 12 Occupy cities in NYS identified on Wikipedia: Albany, Binghamton, Buffalo, Fredonia, Ithaca, Kingston, New Paltz, Poughkeepsie, Rochester, Saranac Lake, Syracuse, and Utica.

_________________________________________________________________

EVENTS
HARLEM
December 21, 6-9PM Occupy Harlem General Assembly (speaking of Occupies...)
Guest Speaker Glen Ford, Executive Editor, Black Agenda Report
More info: occupyharlemgeneralassembly@gmail.com

Location: St. Philip’s Church, 204 W. 134th St, off Adam Clayton Powell Blvd.
#2 or 3 train, 135th St stop.
___________________________________________________________________________________

MEETINGS
ALBANY
MONDAY DECEMBER 19, 7:00 - 8:30PM PRISON FAMILIES OF NEW YORK

Speaker Meeting
Guest Speaker:  Judith Brink, Prison Action Network, speaking on Parole Reform

Free and open to the public. Holiday refreshments

All other Mondays of the month meetings are in the form of support groups. If you have an incarcerated loved one you are welcome. Same place, same time.

Location: 373 Central Av, Albany near McDonalds
_____________________________________________________

BUFFALO meeting
MONDAY JANUARY 30, 2012 PRISONERS ARE PEOPLE TOO!
We’ve never held a monthly meeting in December and this December is no different. Our volunteers need a break to rejuvenate, meditate, and celebrate. Monthly meetings will resume next year. Until then, we wish you "BEST BLESSINGS FOR THIS HOLIDAY SEASON AND BEYOND!"
 
"God has not called us to see through each other, but to see each other through." (Anonymous)
____________________________________________________

HARLEM meeting
OCCASIONAL SATURDAYS 1-4 PM FAMILIES BEHIND THE WALL MEETINGS

Sponsored by Senator Bill Perkins, held in his office. Open to all who have a family member or friend in prison and would like to see some changes. Please contact special assistant Tahj Berrien for date of next meeting or for more information at 212-222-7315; tahj.berrien@gmail.com

Location: Adam Clayton Powell Jr. State Office Bldg., 163 W. 125th St., Suite 912, NYC 10027



Building Bridges is published by Prison Action Network as a way of communicating with our members.
If you would like to join, please call us at 518 253 7533 or send an email.